Public opinion on European Union consular protection and assistance overseas

This report presents findings from the survey experiment Public Opinion on EU Consular Protection and Assistance Overseas, conducted in Spain in June 2025. The study examines citizens’ awareness, legitimacy perceptions, and governance preferences regarding the EU’s evolving role in consular protection, particularly in light of the 2023 proposal to reform Directive 2015/637. Based on a representative survey of 1,200 respondents, we show citizens’ information conditions (travel behavior and rights literacy), the visibility of political versus operational actors, legitimacy indicators (trust, responsibility attribution, confidence), and baseline preferences for how consular protection should be governed. Overall, our findings show that respondents view consular protection positively but form opinions under limited practical experience and uneven knowledge of their rights. Political EU institutions are widely recognized, whereas operational arms (e.g., EU Delegations, EEAS) are less visible. In addition, legitimacy indicators show that citizens expect national authorities to remain central while acknowledging a substantial coordinating role for the EU. These findings suggest that the proposed Directive enjoys a permissive legitimacy environment in Spain. Yet, the Spanish case offers an informative baseline as citizens are more supportive of the EU taking a supporting role rather than a replacing role (taking over national consular responsibilities entirely).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quaderns IEE
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/quadernsiee.135
Primary Topic
International Law and Aviation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public opinion on European Union consular protection and assistance overseas

Ana Mar Fernández Pasarín, Merve Biten Butorac
Quaderns IEE
International Law and Aviation
article

Public opinion on European Union consular protection and assistance overseas

Ana Mar Fernández Pasarín, Merve Biten Butorac
article en

Abstract

This report presents findings from the survey experiment Public Opinion on EU Consular Protection and Assistance Overseas, conducted in Spain in June 2025. The study examines citizens’ awareness, legitimacy perceptions, and governance preferences regarding the EU’s evolving role in consular protection, particularly in light of the 2023 proposal to reform Directive 2015/637. Based on a representative survey of 1,200 respondents, we show citizens’ information conditions (travel behavior and rights literacy), the visibility of political versus operational actors, legitimacy indicators (trust, responsibility attribution, confidence), and baseline preferences for how consular protection should be governed. Overall, our findings show that respondents view consular protection positively but form opinions under limited practical experience and uneven knowledge of their rights. Political EU institutions are widely recognized, whereas operational arms (e.g., EU Delegations, EEAS) are less visible. In addition, legitimacy indicators show that citizens expect national authorities to remain central while acknowledging a substantial coordinating role for the EU. These findings suggest that the proposed Directive enjoys a permissive legitimacy environment in Spain. Yet, the Spanish case offers an informative baseline as citizens are more supportive of the EU taking a supporting role rather than a replacing role (taking over national consular responsibilities entirely).

Quaderns IEEVol. 5(1)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
International Law and Aviation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.