The Effects of Constant Mechanical Wind, Sinusoidal Wind, and Simulated Natural Wind on Thermal Comfort in a Slightly Hot Environment

In high-temperature environments, using airflow systems has been demonstrated to be an effective method of regulating thermal sensation and enhancing thermal comfort. Given the importance of optimizing airflow selection strategies, the impact of different airflow forms on thermal comfort is a topic worthy of consideration. This study aimed to compare and analyze thermal comfort under three distinct airflow conditions: constant mechanical wind, sinusoidal wind and simulated natural wind. The experimental condition was set to a high temperature of 30 °C. The experimental results show that thermal sensation votes (TSV) are lower and thermal comfort votes (TCV) are higher in the simulated natural wind environment than in the other two environments. Statistical analysis of subjects’ environmental preferences showed that simulated natural wind was the most preferred option. When exposed to simulated natural wind, subjects reported a stronger sense of softness and relaxation than when exposed to constant mechanical wind or sinusoidal wind. Additionally, the level of calmness experienced under the simulated natural wind condition was found to be lower than that observed under the constant mechanical wind condition. Comparing TSV and TCV results over time reveals that thermal comfort is influenced not only by thermal sensation but also by the stimulation that different types of airflow variation exert on the human body. Concurrently, in airflow environments, thermal sensation exhibits a non-linear relationship with changes in skin temperature, and this relationship may be influenced by airflow stimulation. This study clarifies the mechanism by which different airflows affect thermal comfort differently in high-temperature environments. It thereby provides both experimental evidence and theoretical support for the airflow design of air-conditioning systems, with the goal of aligning such designs with human physiological perceptual characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203711
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of Constant Mechanical Wind, Sinusoidal Wind, and Simulated Natural Wind on Thermal Comfort in a Slightly Hot Environment

Qin Kang, Jing Ling, Bin Cao, Yongrui Wang et al.
1 citations
Buildings
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.01
article

The Effects of Constant Mechanical Wind, Sinusoidal Wind, and Simulated Natural Wind on Thermal Comfort in a Slightly Hot Environment

Qin Kang, Jing Ling, Bin Cao, Yongrui Wang, Jing Li, Mingliang Gu, Jinwen Liu, Yuan Miao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In high-temperature environments, using airflow systems has been demonstrated to be an effective method of regulating thermal sensation and enhancing thermal comfort. Given the importance of optimizing airflow selection strategies, the impact of different airflow forms on thermal comfort is a topic worthy of consideration. This study aimed to compare and analyze thermal comfort under three distinct airflow conditions: constant mechanical wind, sinusoidal wind and simulated natural wind. The experimental condition was set to a high temperature of 30 °C. The experimental results show that thermal sensation votes (TSV) are lower and thermal comfort votes (TCV) are higher in the simulated natural wind environment than in the other two environments. Statistical analysis of subjects’ environmental preferences showed that simulated natural wind was the most preferred option. When exposed to simulated natural wind, subjects reported a stronger sense of softness and relaxation than when exposed to constant mechanical wind or sinusoidal wind. Additionally, the level of calmness experienced under the simulated natural wind condition was found to be lower than that observed under the constant mechanical wind condition. Comparing TSV and TCV results over time reveals that thermal comfort is influenced not only by thermal sensation but also by the stimulation that different types of airflow variation exert on the human body. Concurrently, in airflow environments, thermal sensation exhibits a non-linear relationship with changes in skin temperature, and this relationship may be influenced by airflow stimulation. This study clarifies the mechanism by which different airflows affect thermal comfort differently in high-temperature environments. It thereby provides both experimental evidence and theoretical support for the airflow design of air-conditioning systems, with the goal of aligning such designs with human physiological perceptual characteristics.

BuildingsVol. 15(20)
Haier Group (China) (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.