Routine Transposition or In Situ Decompression? Rethinking Ulnar Nerve Strategy in Distal Humerus Fractures

<b>Background</b>: Fractures of the distal humerus (DHFs) represent challenging intra-articular injuries that are often followed by postoperative complications, most notably ulnar neuropathy. There is still debate regarding the best method of handling the ulnar nerve during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). <b>Objective</b>: The primary objective was to evaluate the incidence of postoperative ulnar neuropathy (UN) in patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for DHFs, comparing anterior transposition (AT) with in situ decompression (ISD) of the ulnar nerve. Additionally, we investigated the influence of AT on individuals presenting with preoperative UN. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective review was conducted on 68 patients (26 females and 42 males; mean age: 46.3 years) who underwent ORIF for intra-articular DHF between 2018 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: anterior transposition (<i>n</i> = 14) and in situ decompression (<i>n</i> = 54). Ulnar neuropathy was evaluated using the modified McGowan classification, and radiographic outcomes were assessed with AO/OTA fracture classification. <b>Results</b>: Sixty-eight patients (26F/42M) were included. The mean age was 46.3 years (20-77 years) and the mean follow-up time was 53 months (36-76 months). The postoperative UN incidence was 30.8% (21/68). Neuropathy was significantly higher in the transposition group compared to in situ decompression (57.1% vs. 24%; <i>p</i> = 0.012). Olecranon osteotomy (36.3% vs. 20%; <i>p</i> = 0.042) and parallel plate configuration (33.3% vs. 12.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.037) were also associated with increased neuropathy risk. Among patients with preoperative ulnar neuropathy (<i>n</i> = 12), functional recovery was more favorable with transposition, where 71% experienced full resolution compared to 60% in the in situ group. <b>Conclusions</b>: Routine anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve during ORIF for DHF is associated with an increased risk of postoperative neuropathy and should be avoided in patients without preoperative symptoms. However, transposition appears beneficial in patients with pre-existing ulnar neuropathy. Surgeons should individualize ulnar nerve management to balance surgical risks and neurological outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207233
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.05
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Routine Transposition or In Situ Decompression? Rethinking Ulnar Nerve Strategy in Distal Humerus Fractures

Murat Aşçı, Tahir Öztürk, Mete Gedikbaş, Fırat Erpala
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
2.05
article

Routine Transposition or In Situ Decompression? Rethinking Ulnar Nerve Strategy in Distal Humerus Fractures

Murat Aşçı, Tahir Öztürk, Mete Gedikbaş, Fırat Erpala
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Fractures of the distal humerus (DHFs) represent challenging intra-articular injuries that are often followed by postoperative complications, most notably ulnar neuropathy. There is still debate regarding the best method of handling the ulnar nerve during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). <b>Objective</b>: The primary objective was to evaluate the incidence of postoperative ulnar neuropathy (UN) in patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for DHFs, comparing anterior transposition (AT) with in situ decompression (ISD) of the ulnar nerve. Additionally, we investigated the influence of AT on individuals presenting with preoperative UN. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective review was conducted on 68 patients (26 females and 42 males; mean age: 46.3 years) who underwent ORIF for intra-articular DHF between 2018 and 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: anterior transposition (<i>n</i> = 14) and in situ decompression (<i>n</i> = 54). Ulnar neuropathy was evaluated using the modified McGowan classification, and radiographic outcomes were assessed with AO/OTA fracture classification. <b>Results</b>: Sixty-eight patients (26F/42M) were included. The mean age was 46.3 years (20-77 years) and the mean follow-up time was 53 months (36-76 months). The postoperative UN incidence was 30.8% (21/68). Neuropathy was significantly higher in the transposition group compared to in situ decompression (57.1% vs. 24%; <i>p</i> = 0.012). Olecranon osteotomy (36.3% vs. 20%; <i>p</i> = 0.042) and parallel plate configuration (33.3% vs. 12.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.037) were also associated with increased neuropathy risk. Among patients with preoperative ulnar neuropathy (<i>n</i> = 12), functional recovery was more favorable with transposition, where 71% experienced full resolution compared to 60% in the in situ group. <b>Conclusions</b>: Routine anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve during ORIF for DHF is associated with an increased risk of postoperative neuropathy and should be avoided in patients without preoperative symptoms. However, transposition appears beneficial in patients with pre-existing ulnar neuropathy. Surgeons should individualize ulnar nerve management to balance surgical risks and neurological outcomes.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(20)
Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi (TR), State Hospital (GB), Memorial Sisli Hospital (TR), Istanbul Memorial Hospital (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
2.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.