Note-taking moderates the relationship between invested mental effort and solving chirality tasks

When visual representations of molecules ( e.g. , skeletal formula) must be decoded to process a task ( e.g. , determine the absolute configuration of a molecule) and the corresponding schemas are not yet sufficiently automated, paper–pencil format notes may help select relevant information, organize it appropriately, and integrate knowledge without exceeding the working memory capacity (encoding and external storage). This article examines the extent to which task difficulty and invested mental effort differ for digital and paper–pencil-based tasks on the topic of chirality (RQ1) and the extent to which note-taking impacts students’ working memory load when working on paper–pencil-based chirality tasks (RQ2). The dataset is based on the responses of 80 students from Germany who completed 19 chirality task tandems (each consisting of one digital and one paper–pencil-based task) and rated their invested mental effort for each task. Item response theory analyses, group comparisons, and moderation analyses were conducted. Paper–pencil-based chirality tasks were found to be significantly easier than digital chirality tasks, and students invested significantly less mental effort in completing the paper–pencil-based chirality tasks (RQ1). Students who took notes in the paper–pencil format were found to be more capable of solving chirality tasks in both formats. Both groups invested a comparable amount of mental effort. A moderation analysis revealed that when note-taking was low, the relationship between invested mental effort and the probability of solving the task was strongest. For the note-takers, the relationship between the invested mental effort and the probability of solving the task decreased as the number of notes increased (RQ2). The results indicate that notes as external storage are relevant for processing tasks requiring handling representation. As the digital format does not offer comparable options for taking notes, notes represent a subject-specific format difference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemistry Education Research and Practice
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d5rp00256g
Primary Topic
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Note-taking moderates the relationship between invested mental effort and solving chirality tasks

Katrin Schuessler, Maik Walpuski, Michael Giese
Chemistry Education Research and Practice
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
article

Note-taking moderates the relationship between invested mental effort and solving chirality tasks

Katrin Schuessler, Maik Walpuski, Michael Giese
article en

Abstract

When visual representations of molecules ( e.g. , skeletal formula) must be decoded to process a task ( e.g. , determine the absolute configuration of a molecule) and the corresponding schemas are not yet sufficiently automated, paper–pencil format notes may help select relevant information, organize it appropriately, and integrate knowledge without exceeding the working memory capacity (encoding and external storage). This article examines the extent to which task difficulty and invested mental effort differ for digital and paper–pencil-based tasks on the topic of chirality (RQ1) and the extent to which note-taking impacts students’ working memory load when working on paper–pencil-based chirality tasks (RQ2). The dataset is based on the responses of 80 students from Germany who completed 19 chirality task tandems (each consisting of one digital and one paper–pencil-based task) and rated their invested mental effort for each task. Item response theory analyses, group comparisons, and moderation analyses were conducted. Paper–pencil-based chirality tasks were found to be significantly easier than digital chirality tasks, and students invested significantly less mental effort in completing the paper–pencil-based chirality tasks (RQ1). Students who took notes in the paper–pencil format were found to be more capable of solving chirality tasks in both formats. Both groups invested a comparable amount of mental effort. A moderation analysis revealed that when note-taking was low, the relationship between invested mental effort and the probability of solving the task was strongest. For the note-takers, the relationship between the invested mental effort and the probability of solving the task decreased as the number of notes increased (RQ2). The results indicate that notes as external storage are relevant for processing tasks requiring handling representation. As the digital format does not offer comparable options for taking notes, notes represent a subject-specific format difference.

Chemistry Education Research and PracticeVol. 27(1)
University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.