The Effect of Chlorhexidine Mouthwashes on the Microbiota Associated with Peri-Implantitis Lesions: A Pilot Study

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Chlorhexidine (CHX)-based mouthwashes are the most commonly used chemical methods as adjuvants for the treatment of peri-implant diseases, but there is a lack of information on their effect on the peri-implant microbiota. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of short-time (15 days) self-administered 0.05% and 0.12% commercial chlorhexidine mouthwashes on the peri-implant pocket microbiota of patients with peri-implantitis. <b>Methods:</b> In this pilot study, we analyzed the microbial composition of peri-implant lesions in 22 patients before and after a 15-day regimen of thrice-daily use of two commercial chlorhexidine mouthwashes containing 0.05% (<i>n</i> = 11) and 0.12% chlorhexidine (<i>n</i> = 11). Microbial samples were collected using paper points, and the taxonomic composition was determined through sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons using Illumina MiSeq. <b>Results:</b> Although individual responses to chlorhexidine mouthwash treatment varied significantly, neither concentration produced a statistically significant change in the microbial diversity associated with peri-implantitis, suggesting limited treatment penetration into peri-implant lesions. Similarly, changes in the abundance of specific odontopathogens were not statistically significant. <b>Conclusions:</b> We found no significant differences in the effect of mouthwashes with different chlorhexidine concentrations on the peri-implant microbiota in short-period applications. Even though more extensive studies are required, the observed patient-dependent outcomes of both chlorhexidine mouthwashes on the peri-implant microbiota and their limited effect in controlling the abundance of oral pathogens indicate that prescription of chlorhexidine mouthwashes for the treatment of peri-implantitis should be carried out with caution. Novel presentations of chlorhexidine with better penetration capacities should be developed, as they could offer enhanced benefits in managing peri-implant diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antibiotics
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14101032
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Chlorhexidine Mouthwashes on the Microbiota Associated with Peri-Implantitis Lesions: A Pilot Study

Ana Otero, Ana Parga, José Manuel Pose-Rodríguez, Alexandre Arredondo et al.
Antibiotics
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

The Effect of Chlorhexidine Mouthwashes on the Microbiota Associated with Peri-Implantitis Lesions: A Pilot Study

Ana Otero, Ana Parga, José Manuel Pose-Rodríguez, Alexandre Arredondo, Andrea Muras, Paz Otero‐Casal, Mercedes Gallas, Félix Pose-Otero
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Chlorhexidine (CHX)-based mouthwashes are the most commonly used chemical methods as adjuvants for the treatment of peri-implant diseases, but there is a lack of information on their effect on the peri-implant microbiota. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of short-time (15 days) self-administered 0.05% and 0.12% commercial chlorhexidine mouthwashes on the peri-implant pocket microbiota of patients with peri-implantitis. <b>Methods:</b> In this pilot study, we analyzed the microbial composition of peri-implant lesions in 22 patients before and after a 15-day regimen of thrice-daily use of two commercial chlorhexidine mouthwashes containing 0.05% (<i>n</i> = 11) and 0.12% chlorhexidine (<i>n</i> = 11). Microbial samples were collected using paper points, and the taxonomic composition was determined through sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons using Illumina MiSeq. <b>Results:</b> Although individual responses to chlorhexidine mouthwash treatment varied significantly, neither concentration produced a statistically significant change in the microbial diversity associated with peri-implantitis, suggesting limited treatment penetration into peri-implant lesions. Similarly, changes in the abundance of specific odontopathogens were not statistically significant. <b>Conclusions:</b> We found no significant differences in the effect of mouthwashes with different chlorhexidine concentrations on the peri-implant microbiota in short-period applications. Even though more extensive studies are required, the observed patient-dependent outcomes of both chlorhexidine mouthwashes on the peri-implant microbiota and their limited effect in controlling the abundance of oral pathogens indicate that prescription of chlorhexidine mouthwashes for the treatment of peri-implantitis should be carried out with caution. Novel presentations of chlorhexidine with better penetration capacities should be developed, as they could offer enhanced benefits in managing peri-implant diseases.

AntibioticsVol. 14(10)
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES), Dentaid (Spain) (ES), Servicio Gallego de Salud (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.