Cities Leading on Climate Action: A Comparison of Los Angeles’s and Boston’s Green New Deals

Background: The Green New Deal (GND) is a promising approach to simultaneously address the climate crisis and inequality through a programme of targeted public investment. It is a visionary framework for governments to radically shift their climate policy to focus on decarbonization, inequity, and a just transition. Extant GND literature primarily focuses on national plans, the European Green Deal, and increasingly on the need for a Global GND. However, cities across the United States and globally have also begun to adopt GNDs. While there is a burgeoning literature on municipal climate action, the emergence of city-level GNDs has not been addressed. Methods: This project includes a qualitative comparative analysis of Boston’s and Los Angeles’s GNDs, including elite interviews with relevant policymakers and stakeholders. We employ Vogel and Henstra’s comparative local policy analysis to analyze the policy content and policy process of each GND. Results: GNDs are an impactful tool for cities to address climate, inequity, and justice. They are considered more comprehensive, holistic, specific, and coordinated than previous municipal climate plans. We also discuss the reasons that each city adopted a GND, as well as the factors that shaped them. We conclude by providing lessons for policymakers across North America in adopting their own city-level GNDs. Conclusion: Boston and Los Angeles are useful examples for other cities considering adopting a GND. The GND is an exciting approach to support policymakers and organizations in creating a more equitable and sustainable future for everyone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of city climate policy and economy
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3138/jccpe-2023-0027
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cities Leading on Climate Action: A Comparison of Los Angeles’s and Boston’s Green New Deals

Kyla Tienhaara, Tess Wittmann
Journal of city climate policy and economy
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Cities Leading on Climate Action: A Comparison of Los Angeles’s and Boston’s Green New Deals

Kyla Tienhaara, Tess Wittmann
article en

Abstract

Background: The Green New Deal (GND) is a promising approach to simultaneously address the climate crisis and inequality through a programme of targeted public investment. It is a visionary framework for governments to radically shift their climate policy to focus on decarbonization, inequity, and a just transition. Extant GND literature primarily focuses on national plans, the European Green Deal, and increasingly on the need for a Global GND. However, cities across the United States and globally have also begun to adopt GNDs. While there is a burgeoning literature on municipal climate action, the emergence of city-level GNDs has not been addressed. Methods: This project includes a qualitative comparative analysis of Boston’s and Los Angeles’s GNDs, including elite interviews with relevant policymakers and stakeholders. We employ Vogel and Henstra’s comparative local policy analysis to analyze the policy content and policy process of each GND. Results: GNDs are an impactful tool for cities to address climate, inequity, and justice. They are considered more comprehensive, holistic, specific, and coordinated than previous municipal climate plans. We also discuss the reasons that each city adopted a GND, as well as the factors that shaped them. We conclude by providing lessons for policymakers across North America in adopting their own city-level GNDs. Conclusion: Boston and Los Angeles are useful examples for other cities considering adopting a GND. The GND is an exciting approach to support policymakers and organizations in creating a more equitable and sustainable future for everyone.

Journal of city climate policy and economyVol. 4(3)
Queen's University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.