Shining Light on Labels in the Dark: Guidelines for Offensive Collections Materials

The natural history collections community has made significant strides in the past decade in the digitization of their holdings. Digitization has made the data and corresponding images of collections publicly available to researchers, students, and the public. Data and images are served online by institutions’ local databases, and regional, national, and international aggregators. One challenging aspect in digitizing natural history collections is the presence of offensive language, such as racial slurs in collection and location data. We present findings from a community survey and analysis of data from relevant aggregators to assess the presence of and approach to offensive language in collections data. We also suggest initial guidelines for data warning statements and disclaimers and transcription guidelines to help preserve historical integrity of data while also supporting inclusive and safe workspaces. Please note that in writing about offensive terms found in natural history collections, we use and refer to offensive terms and include images of labels and documents to provide examples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/mwvj-9y18
Primary Topic
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shining Light on Labels in the Dark: Guidelines for Offensive Collections Materials

McKenna Santiago Coyle, Laura Briscoe, Janelle Baker, Aliya Donnell Davenport et al.
UNC Libraries
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
article

Shining Light on Labels in the Dark: Guidelines for Offensive Collections Materials

McKenna Santiago Coyle, Laura Briscoe, Janelle Baker, Aliya Donnell Davenport, Mare Nazaire, Carol Ann McCormick, Janet Mansaray, Michaela Schmull, J. R. M. Allen
article en

Abstract

The natural history collections community has made significant strides in the past decade in the digitization of their holdings. Digitization has made the data and corresponding images of collections publicly available to researchers, students, and the public. Data and images are served online by institutions’ local databases, and regional, national, and international aggregators. One challenging aspect in digitizing natural history collections is the presence of offensive language, such as racial slurs in collection and location data. We present findings from a community survey and analysis of data from relevant aggregators to assess the presence of and approach to offensive language in collections data. We also suggest initial guidelines for data warning statements and disclaimers and transcription guidelines to help preserve historical integrity of data while also supporting inclusive and safe workspaces. Please note that in writing about offensive terms found in natural history collections, we use and refer to offensive terms and include images of labels and documents to provide examples.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Shining Light on Labels in the Dark: Guidelines for Offensive Collections Materials — McKenna Santiago Coyle, Laura Briscoe, et al. · UNC Libraries (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS