Another Consequence of Overturning Roe: Imperiling Progress on Clinical Research in Pregnancy

In recent years, tremendous progress has been made toward recognizing the need for improved medical knowledge for pregnant people, a population group that has long been excluded from clinical trials and suffered the harms that result from a poor evidence base to inform care (Lyerly, Little, and Faden 2008). From the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), federal agencies have signaled strong support for closing knowledge gaps in pregnancy, in part through advancing responsible inclusion of pregnant individuals in clinical research (e.g., FDA 2018; PRGLAC 2018). As evidence of progress, a new National Academies report on improving representation in clinical trials emphasizes that a more equitable research enterprise would be responsive to the clinical needs of pregnant people (NASEM 2022).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/d7pa-pk68
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Another Consequence of Overturning Roe: Imperiling Progress on Clinical Research in Pregnancy

Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Miranda R. Waggoner
UNC Libraries
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Another Consequence of Overturning Roe: Imperiling Progress on Clinical Research in Pregnancy

Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Miranda R. Waggoner
article en

Abstract

In recent years, tremendous progress has been made toward recognizing the need for improved medical knowledge for pregnant people, a population group that has long been excluded from clinical trials and suffered the harms that result from a poor evidence base to inform care (Lyerly, Little, and Faden 2008). From the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), federal agencies have signaled strong support for closing knowledge gaps in pregnancy, in part through advancing responsible inclusion of pregnant individuals in clinical research (e.g., FDA 2018; PRGLAC 2018). As evidence of progress, a new National Academies report on improving representation in clinical trials emphasizes that a more equitable research enterprise would be responsive to the clinical needs of pregnant people (NASEM 2022).

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.