Seismic bearing capacity and fragility analysis of geogrid-encased stone column composite foundations

Geogrid-encased stone columns (GESCs) have shown notable potential in improving performance, thereby reducing the seismic failure probability ( P F ) of soil. This research proposes a limit equilibrium-based formulation for predicting the ultimate seismic bearing capacity ( q u ) of GESC composite foundations. Subsequently, a fragility analysis framework is developed based on the bearing capacity formula to quantify P F . The fragility analysis incorporates machine learning to evaluate the influence of tensile strength ( T ), column diameter ( D c ), column and soil strength parameters ( φ c , c c , φ s , and c s ), shear strength utilization ratio ( n ), area replacement ratio ( m ), vertical load demand ( P v ), footing width ( B ), footing embedded depth ( h 0 ), and seismic coefficients ( k h and k v ). Results demonstrate that encasement substantially enhances q u and reduces earthquake-induced settlements. The fragility function demonstrates a critical behavioral transition at n ≈ 0.5. P F decreases with increasing T , m , φ c , c c , φ s , c s , B , and h 0 , but increases with k v , D c , and P v . The significant impact and indeterminacy of soil properties suggest P F shall be reduced by selecting the controllable parameters (e.g., T and D c ). Larger B improves load diffusion, and increased h 0 maximizes vertical effective stress. Large D c delays confinement mobilization, potentially reducing the reinforcement effectiveness and increasing the failure risk. • A limit equilibrium-based formulation for calculating ultimate seismic bearing capacity of GESC. • A machine learning-based fragility analysis framework for quantifying the failure probability of GESC. • GESC withstands a high acceleration level of 0.9 g, while OSC fails at 0.54 g. • Controllable parameters shall be considered due to the significant effect of surrounding soil on failure probability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2025.09.003
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seismic bearing capacity and fragility analysis of geogrid-encased stone column composite foundations

Jia Tan, Xiaocong Cai, Yue Shao, Ling Zhang et al.
Geotextiles and Geomembranes
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Seismic bearing capacity and fragility analysis of geogrid-encased stone column composite foundations

Jia Tan, Xiaocong Cai, Yue Shao, Ling Zhang, Zijian Yang
article en

Abstract

Geogrid-encased stone columns (GESCs) have shown notable potential in improving performance, thereby reducing the seismic failure probability ( P F ) of soil. This research proposes a limit equilibrium-based formulation for predicting the ultimate seismic bearing capacity ( q u ) of GESC composite foundations. Subsequently, a fragility analysis framework is developed based on the bearing capacity formula to quantify P F . The fragility analysis incorporates machine learning to evaluate the influence of tensile strength ( T ), column diameter ( D c ), column and soil strength parameters ( φ c , c c , φ s , and c s ), shear strength utilization ratio ( n ), area replacement ratio ( m ), vertical load demand ( P v ), footing width ( B ), footing embedded depth ( h 0 ), and seismic coefficients ( k h and k v ). Results demonstrate that encasement substantially enhances q u and reduces earthquake-induced settlements. The fragility function demonstrates a critical behavioral transition at n ≈ 0.5. P F decreases with increasing T , m , φ c , c c , φ s , c s , B , and h 0 , but increases with k v , D c , and P v . The significant impact and indeterminacy of soil properties suggest P F shall be reduced by selecting the controllable parameters (e.g., T and D c ). Larger B improves load diffusion, and increased h 0 maximizes vertical effective stress. Large D c delays confinement mobilization, potentially reducing the reinforcement effectiveness and increasing the failure risk. • A limit equilibrium-based formulation for calculating ultimate seismic bearing capacity of GESC. • A machine learning-based fragility analysis framework for quantifying the failure probability of GESC. • GESC withstands a high acceleration level of 0.9 g, while OSC fails at 0.54 g. • Controllable parameters shall be considered due to the significant effect of surrounding soil on failure probability.

Geotextiles and GeomembranesVol. 54(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Seismic bearing capacity and fragility analysis of geogrid-encased stone column composite foundations — Jia Tan, Xiaocong Cai, et al. · Geotextiles and Geomembranes (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS