Field test evaluations of a liquid desiccant system for air dehumidification at a gas pressure station

• Two-year field test of a liquid desiccant system at a gas pressure station. • System operated continuously with and without internal absorber cooling. • Internal absorber cooling improved moisture removal rate by up to 70 %. • Up to 21 % annual primary energy savings for natural gas preheating. A full-scale, internally cooled/heated liquid-desiccant system was installed at a gas pressure regulating and metering station to dehumidify outdoor supply air to a low dew point (∼1 °C), enabling low post-expansion gas temperatures while avoiding external condensation. Prior work has paid little attention to dehumidification-enabled savings in natural-gas preheating and dynamic field-based assessments of liquid desiccant systems—especially comparisons of absorber operation with and without cooling—are scarce. These gaps were addressed by analysing two years of field measurement data to characterize liquid desiccant system performance depending on absorber mode (with and without cooling) and to determine annual natural-gas preheating savings achieved by dehumidification. From field data, annual primary-energy savings due to dehumidification with absorber cooling were quantified relative to no dehumidification. Using the same boundary conditions, TRNSYS simulations quantified summer natural-gas preheating savings for operation without absorber cooling. Results show that the difference between the heating- and cooling-water inlet temperatures of the liquid desiccant system strongly affects the moisture removal rate and provides a possibility to control the outlet humidity ratio. Increasing this temperature difference by 10 K raised the moisture-removal rate by up to 35 %. Absorber cooling increased the moisture-removal rate by 54 % but reduced the thermal COP by 30 % at an outdoor-air humidity ratio of 10 g kg −1 compared to operation without absorber cooling. Annual primary-energy savings for natural-gas preheating reached up to 21 % (230 MWh). In summer months internal cooling nearly doubled energy savings in natural gas preheating compared to operation without cooling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Thermal Engineering
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.128722
Primary Topic
Adsorption and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Field test evaluations of a liquid desiccant system for air dehumidification at a gas pressure station

Daniel Fleig, Ulrike Jordan, Felix Micus, Lisa Völker
Applied Thermal Engineering
Adsorption and Cooling Systems
article

Field test evaluations of a liquid desiccant system for air dehumidification at a gas pressure station

Daniel Fleig, Ulrike Jordan, Felix Micus, Lisa Völker
article en

Abstract

• Two-year field test of a liquid desiccant system at a gas pressure station. • System operated continuously with and without internal absorber cooling. • Internal absorber cooling improved moisture removal rate by up to 70 %. • Up to 21 % annual primary energy savings for natural gas preheating. A full-scale, internally cooled/heated liquid-desiccant system was installed at a gas pressure regulating and metering station to dehumidify outdoor supply air to a low dew point (∼1 °C), enabling low post-expansion gas temperatures while avoiding external condensation. Prior work has paid little attention to dehumidification-enabled savings in natural-gas preheating and dynamic field-based assessments of liquid desiccant systems—especially comparisons of absorber operation with and without cooling—are scarce. These gaps were addressed by analysing two years of field measurement data to characterize liquid desiccant system performance depending on absorber mode (with and without cooling) and to determine annual natural-gas preheating savings achieved by dehumidification. From field data, annual primary-energy savings due to dehumidification with absorber cooling were quantified relative to no dehumidification. Using the same boundary conditions, TRNSYS simulations quantified summer natural-gas preheating savings for operation without absorber cooling. Results show that the difference between the heating- and cooling-water inlet temperatures of the liquid desiccant system strongly affects the moisture removal rate and provides a possibility to control the outlet humidity ratio. Increasing this temperature difference by 10 K raised the moisture-removal rate by up to 35 %. Absorber cooling increased the moisture-removal rate by 54 % but reduced the thermal COP by 30 % at an outdoor-air humidity ratio of 10 g kg −1 compared to operation without absorber cooling. Annual primary-energy savings for natural-gas preheating reached up to 21 % (230 MWh). In summer months internal cooling nearly doubled energy savings in natural gas preheating compared to operation without cooling.

Applied Thermal EngineeringVol. 281
University of Kassel (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Adsorption and Cooling Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.