Cui bono? Who benefits from leveraging information behaviour of their online social connections?

Introduction. The underlying assumption of social, link-based information access posits that individuals engaging in online social networks derive benefits from the information shared by their online connections. This assumption is scrutinised in this study through an examination of the information-sharing behaviour of individual users with their online social connections. Method. This research utilised a large dataset pertaining to books and movies sourced from Imhonet, integrating elements of a recommender system and a social networking service. Specifically, the study incorporated 125,657 books, 44,184 movies, associated ratings, and a social network comprising 234,789 relationships. Analysis. The analysis of user patterns categorised the target users into two distinct categories: those exhibiting sufficiently congruent preferences with their online connections (suggesting the suitability of social link-based information access) and those lacking similar preferences with their connections (indicating potential ineffectiveness of social link-based information access). Results. Subsequent assessments included the analysis of rating patterns and social characteristics of the target users that distinguish the two identified categories, which were examined using binary logistic regressions. Conclusion. This study delved into the dynamics between online users' information-sharing tendencies with their online connections and the diverse user characteristics influencing these patterns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Research an international electronic journal
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30354555
Primary Topic
Knowledge Management and Sharing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cui bono? Who benefits from leveraging information behaviour of their online social connections?

Danielle Hyunsook Lee, Peter L. Brusilovsky
Information Research an international electronic journal
Knowledge Management and Sharing
article

Cui bono? Who benefits from leveraging information behaviour of their online social connections?

Danielle Hyunsook Lee, Peter L. Brusilovsky
article en

Abstract

Introduction. The underlying assumption of social, link-based information access posits that individuals engaging in online social networks derive benefits from the information shared by their online connections. This assumption is scrutinised in this study through an examination of the information-sharing behaviour of individual users with their online social connections. Method. This research utilised a large dataset pertaining to books and movies sourced from Imhonet, integrating elements of a recommender system and a social networking service. Specifically, the study incorporated 125,657 books, 44,184 movies, associated ratings, and a social network comprising 234,789 relationships. Analysis. The analysis of user patterns categorised the target users into two distinct categories: those exhibiting sufficiently congruent preferences with their online connections (suggesting the suitability of social link-based information access) and those lacking similar preferences with their connections (indicating potential ineffectiveness of social link-based information access). Results. Subsequent assessments included the analysis of rating patterns and social characteristics of the target users that distinguish the two identified categories, which were examined using binary logistic regressions. Conclusion. This study delved into the dynamics between online users' information-sharing tendencies with their online connections and the diverse user characteristics influencing these patterns.

Information Research an international electronic journalVol. 30(3)
University of Pittsburgh (US), Chung-Ang University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Knowledge Management and Sharing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.