Academic social networks and self-branding among library and information science academics in the European Union

Introduction. This research analyses the perception and habits about digital platforms and self-branding among European scholars in the library and information science area. Method. A survey using a questionnaire was administered online to 1,562 scholars working in public universities in the European Union. A response of 201 respondents was obtained. Analysis. The collected data by Google Forms were processed using a specific spreadsheet in Excel and analysed using the software SPSS Statistics. Independent-samples t (two-tailed) and Chi-squared tests were used to check for significant differences between variables. Results. Most participants think that digital platforms are useful for increasing the visibility of their work and managing their reputation, particularly ResearchGate and Google Scholar, although there is limited information in their profiles about their academic activity. The responses show a positive attitude towards personal branding, but most do not adopt it mainly due to not having enough time. Scholars who use personal branding are more committed to the use of personal websites and disseminating their academic achievements. Conclusion. These findings support the need for more in-depth investigations related to the strategies of academics engaging in personal branding, as well as measuring the impact it has on their academic and professional careers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Research an international electronic journal
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47989/ir30341815
Primary Topic
Web and Library Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Academic social networks and self-branding among library and information science academics in the European Union

Gonzalo Marco Cuenca, Rosario Arquero Avilés, Brenda Siso-Calvo, Chiara Faggiolani
Information Research an international electronic journal
Web and Library Services
article

Academic social networks and self-branding among library and information science academics in the European Union

Gonzalo Marco Cuenca, Rosario Arquero Avilés, Brenda Siso-Calvo, Chiara Faggiolani
article en

Abstract

Introduction. This research analyses the perception and habits about digital platforms and self-branding among European scholars in the library and information science area. Method. A survey using a questionnaire was administered online to 1,562 scholars working in public universities in the European Union. A response of 201 respondents was obtained. Analysis. The collected data by Google Forms were processed using a specific spreadsheet in Excel and analysed using the software SPSS Statistics. Independent-samples t (two-tailed) and Chi-squared tests were used to check for significant differences between variables. Results. Most participants think that digital platforms are useful for increasing the visibility of their work and managing their reputation, particularly ResearchGate and Google Scholar, although there is limited information in their profiles about their academic activity. The responses show a positive attitude towards personal branding, but most do not adopt it mainly due to not having enough time. Scholars who use personal branding are more committed to the use of personal websites and disseminating their academic achievements. Conclusion. These findings support the need for more in-depth investigations related to the strategies of academics engaging in personal branding, as well as measuring the impact it has on their academic and professional careers.

Information Research an international electronic journalVol. 30(3)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Universidad de Zaragoza (ES), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Web and Library Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.