Unravelling Responsible AI: An Umbrella Review

The term ‘Responsible AI’ (RAI) has become widely adopted in various sectors, including industry, research, and policy, and has also entered general public discourse. There are significant similarities and overlap with terms such as Ethical AI and Responsible AI. As the terminology surrounding AI evolves, it is important to untangle the explicit and implicit meanings of RAI, its relationship with other relevant concepts, and the implications for the AI landscape. This paper examines the ways in which RAI has been defined and described in systematic reviews within academic research between 2013 and early 2024, by conducting an umbrella review. Five main questions are explored in these findings: 1)What is RAI? 2) What are the motivations behind RAI efforts? 3) What is its purpose? 4) What are the terms related to RAI and how they are related? and 5) What are the current challenges and future directions of RAI? This review highlights that despite the potential benefits of AI, there remain risks and concerns surrounding it. This in turn calls for a set of computational and human measures, as well as principles that span from risk mitigation to benefiting humans and addressing social problems. However, RAI is conflated, used interchangeably with, or comprises other terms, and ‘responsible’ and ‘responsibility’ are often used with different connotations. There is also an interesting contradiction between the proliferation of RAI frameworks, and the need for more actionable or operationalisable ones. We discuss the implications of these findings and offer recommendations in light of current challenges and future directions to elucidate the meanings and understandings of RAI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v8i3.36704
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unravelling Responsible AI: An Umbrella Review

Gisela Reyes-Cruz, Eike Schneiders, Pepita Barnard, Virginia Portillo et al.
1 citations
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Unravelling Responsible AI: An Umbrella Review

Gisela Reyes-Cruz, Eike Schneiders, Pepita Barnard, Virginia Portillo, Damian Eke, Liz Dowthwaite, Elvira Pérez Vallejos, Dominic Price, A. Bergin, Joel E. Fischer, Marisela Tachiquin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The term ‘Responsible AI’ (RAI) has become widely adopted in various sectors, including industry, research, and policy, and has also entered general public discourse. There are significant similarities and overlap with terms such as Ethical AI and Responsible AI. As the terminology surrounding AI evolves, it is important to untangle the explicit and implicit meanings of RAI, its relationship with other relevant concepts, and the implications for the AI landscape. This paper examines the ways in which RAI has been defined and described in systematic reviews within academic research between 2013 and early 2024, by conducting an umbrella review. Five main questions are explored in these findings: 1)What is RAI? 2) What are the motivations behind RAI efforts? 3) What is its purpose? 4) What are the terms related to RAI and how they are related? and 5) What are the current challenges and future directions of RAI? This review highlights that despite the potential benefits of AI, there remain risks and concerns surrounding it. This in turn calls for a set of computational and human measures, as well as principles that span from risk mitigation to benefiting humans and addressing social problems. However, RAI is conflated, used interchangeably with, or comprises other terms, and ‘responsible’ and ‘responsibility’ are often used with different connotations. There is also an interesting contradiction between the proliferation of RAI frameworks, and the need for more actionable or operationalisable ones. We discuss the implications of these findings and offer recommendations in light of current challenges and future directions to elucidate the meanings and understandings of RAI.

Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and SocietyVol. 8(3)
University of Nottingham (GB), University of Southampton (GB)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.