Regulatory Policies on Ethics Evaluations for Large-Scale AI Systems

The potential ethical harms of large ML systems have expanded model evaluation processes in parallel, and a breadth of research proposes new metrics or measurement techniques for model bias and safety, and comprehensive documentation frameworks for practitioners to use. The creation of community standards and governance structures indicates intrinsic motivation towards ethical AI, but to bolster accountability beyond voluntary participation, a patchwork of regulatory proposals relying on audits has emerged, which preside over varying jurisdictions and domains of applicability. Ultimately, changes to regulatory policies involving AI evaluations affects organization decision making, and also impacts deployed models. My research interests and ongoing work explore the dynamics between regulators and practitioners, as well as the competing priorities involved, with the hope of improving our ability to ensure deployed systems are ethical, and facilitating discussion among stakeholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v8i3.36778
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulatory Policies on Ethics Evaluations for Large-Scale AI Systems

Neha R. Gupta
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Regulatory Policies on Ethics Evaluations for Large-Scale AI Systems

Neha R. Gupta
article en

Abstract

The potential ethical harms of large ML systems have expanded model evaluation processes in parallel, and a breadth of research proposes new metrics or measurement techniques for model bias and safety, and comprehensive documentation frameworks for practitioners to use. The creation of community standards and governance structures indicates intrinsic motivation towards ethical AI, but to bolster accountability beyond voluntary participation, a patchwork of regulatory proposals relying on audits has emerged, which preside over varying jurisdictions and domains of applicability. Ultimately, changes to regulatory policies involving AI evaluations affects organization decision making, and also impacts deployed models. My research interests and ongoing work explore the dynamics between regulators and practitioners, as well as the competing priorities involved, with the hope of improving our ability to ensure deployed systems are ethical, and facilitating discussion among stakeholders.

Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and SocietyVol. 8(3)
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.