Can Improved Data Representation Support AI for Health Equity? A Visual Approach

Representation is a critical concern in the development, use and decisions about AI. AI fairness and health equity research present frameworks for representation that highlight underlying structural issues (such as systemic discrimination) that go beyond, yet also shape, both data and AI tooling. Still, there is a lack of actionable methods to interrogate data representation and support critical reflection on its role in AI systems. We propose a visual, data-driven approach that links decisions about data representation to AI model performance across subgroups. Our method consists of two plots: the representation association plot, which shows whether subgroup representation affects performance, and the representation expansion plot, which simulates how performance disparities may change when expanding subgroup data. We apply our approach to the Lifelines Cohort Study for two health equity use cases: early detection of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The plots reveal that improving age representation may reduce disparities, while sex and education-based disparities appear unrelated to representation in the dataset. This approach has the potential to guide researchers in identifying when improving data representation may contribute to reducing performance disparities, and when such efforts are unlikely to be effective. As a critical but partial tool, our approach should be embedded in broader inclusive research practices, where representation extends to who defines the data and determines whether and how AI is applied. Future research should validate the actionability of insights with users and priorities of those bearing the health burden.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v8i3.36740
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Improved Data Representation Support AI for Health Equity? A Visual Approach

Cor J. Veenman, Jildau Bouwman, Steven Vethman
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Can Improved Data Representation Support AI for Health Equity? A Visual Approach

Cor J. Veenman, Jildau Bouwman, Steven Vethman
article en

Abstract

Representation is a critical concern in the development, use and decisions about AI. AI fairness and health equity research present frameworks for representation that highlight underlying structural issues (such as systemic discrimination) that go beyond, yet also shape, both data and AI tooling. Still, there is a lack of actionable methods to interrogate data representation and support critical reflection on its role in AI systems. We propose a visual, data-driven approach that links decisions about data representation to AI model performance across subgroups. Our method consists of two plots: the representation association plot, which shows whether subgroup representation affects performance, and the representation expansion plot, which simulates how performance disparities may change when expanding subgroup data. We apply our approach to the Lifelines Cohort Study for two health equity use cases: early detection of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The plots reveal that improving age representation may reduce disparities, while sex and education-based disparities appear unrelated to representation in the dataset. This approach has the potential to guide researchers in identifying when improving data representation may contribute to reducing performance disparities, and when such efforts are unlikely to be effective. As a critical but partial tool, our approach should be embedded in broader inclusive research practices, where representation extends to who defines the data and determines whether and how AI is applied. Future research should validate the actionability of insights with users and priorities of those bearing the health burden.

Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and SocietyVol. 8(3)
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL), Centre for Human Drug Research (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.