Exclusive Flux: A Review of Flux’s Generation of LGBTQ+ Couples

The increasing scope and public use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) platforms, particularly image generation tools, have prompted questions about the safety and fairness of large Vision Language Models (VLMs), e.g., Flux and DALL-E. The ubiquity and convincing realism of AI-generated imagery injects significant challenges into modern digital literacy efforts because VLMs may unintentionally perpetuate historical stereotypes as a result of biases in training data scraped from the web. Because these VLMs are open-use and their synthetic images are not subject to copyright permissions, these model biases can have far-reaching effects that cement societal biases and reinforce exclusionary practices. Therefore, it is critical to explore and identify bias within these models and to cultivate an understanding of the cultural context in which these biases are echoed as a first step to mitigating these problems. This paper provides an in-depth study of bias against LGBTQ+ individuals in images generated by Flux, the leading image generator model. This work uses a One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) approach to critique the heterosexism present in Flux’s generations, discusses the impact that biased GenAI imagery may have on society, and provides a survey of existing mitigation strategies. The results of these experiments highlight a lack of nuance in Flux’s training, leading to biased synthetic image generation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v8i3.36741
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exclusive Flux: A Review of Flux’s Generation of LGBTQ+ Couples

Omar Ochoa, Lynn Vonderhaar, K. Taylor, Jennifer Wojton
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Exclusive Flux: A Review of Flux’s Generation of LGBTQ+ Couples

Omar Ochoa, Lynn Vonderhaar, K. Taylor, Jennifer Wojton
article en

Abstract

The increasing scope and public use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) platforms, particularly image generation tools, have prompted questions about the safety and fairness of large Vision Language Models (VLMs), e.g., Flux and DALL-E. The ubiquity and convincing realism of AI-generated imagery injects significant challenges into modern digital literacy efforts because VLMs may unintentionally perpetuate historical stereotypes as a result of biases in training data scraped from the web. Because these VLMs are open-use and their synthetic images are not subject to copyright permissions, these model biases can have far-reaching effects that cement societal biases and reinforce exclusionary practices. Therefore, it is critical to explore and identify bias within these models and to cultivate an understanding of the cultural context in which these biases are echoed as a first step to mitigating these problems. This paper provides an in-depth study of bias against LGBTQ+ individuals in images generated by Flux, the leading image generator model. This work uses a One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) approach to critique the heterosexism present in Flux’s generations, discusses the impact that biased GenAI imagery may have on society, and provides a survey of existing mitigation strategies. The results of these experiments highlight a lack of nuance in Flux’s training, leading to biased synthetic image generation.

Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and SocietyVol. 8(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.