Principles and Policy Recommendations for Comprehensive Genetic Data Governance

Genetic data collection has become ubiquitous, producing genetic information about health, ancestry, and social traits. However, unregulated use—especially amid evolving scientific understanding—poses serious privacy and discrimination risks. These risks are intensified by advancing AI, particularly multi-modal systems integrating genetic, clinical, behavioral, and environmental data. In this work, we organize the uses of genetic data along four distinct 'pillars', and develop a risk assessment framework that identifies key values any governance system must preserve. In doing so, we draw on current privacy scholarship concerning contextual integrity, data relationality, and the Belmont principle. We apply the framework to four real-world case studies and identify critical gaps in existing regulatory frameworks and specific threats to privacy and personal liberties, particularly through genetic discrimination. Finally, we offer three policy recommendations for genetic data governance that safeguard individual rights in today's under-regulated ecosystem of large-scale genetic data collection and usage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v8i3.36701
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Principles and Policy Recommendations for Comprehensive Genetic Data Governance

Sohini Ramachandran, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Ria Vinod, V. R. Ramanan et al.
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Principles and Policy Recommendations for Comprehensive Genetic Data Governance

Sohini Ramachandran, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, Ria Vinod, V. R. Ramanan, Cole M Williams
article en

Abstract

Genetic data collection has become ubiquitous, producing genetic information about health, ancestry, and social traits. However, unregulated use—especially amid evolving scientific understanding—poses serious privacy and discrimination risks. These risks are intensified by advancing AI, particularly multi-modal systems integrating genetic, clinical, behavioral, and environmental data. In this work, we organize the uses of genetic data along four distinct 'pillars', and develop a risk assessment framework that identifies key values any governance system must preserve. In doing so, we draw on current privacy scholarship concerning contextual integrity, data relationality, and the Belmont principle. We apply the framework to four real-world case studies and identify critical gaps in existing regulatory frameworks and specific threats to privacy and personal liberties, particularly through genetic discrimination. Finally, we offer three policy recommendations for genetic data governance that safeguard individual rights in today's under-regulated ecosystem of large-scale genetic data collection and usage.

Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and SocietyVol. 8(3)
John Brown University (US)
National Science Foundation, John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Brown University, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.