The Dilemmas of Moral Autonomy in the Transfer of Human Consciousness to AI

This paper examines the dilemmas of moral autonomy in the context of the transfer of human consciousness to AI, focusing on the transhumanist archetype Homo Evolutus. Through comparative analysis, the study explores two distinct paradigms: the secular approach, rooted in Kantian philosophy, which considers that moral autonomy can be preserved through transfer; and the religious perspective (Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodox), which argues that the human person is an essential unity of body and soul, making the transfer conceptually impossible. The study highlights three central dilemmas: the authenticity of digital moral reflection, the distribution of responsibility between the biological and digital selves, and the limits of autonomy in human-AI integration. The secular paradigm perpetuates Cartesian dualism, while the theological perspective asserts that consciousness transfer raises fundamental ontological problems that cannot be solved by secular approaches alone. The conclusion emphasizes the need for an interdisciplinary approach that includes theological aspects to clarify what it means to be a moral agent in a technologically altered world.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v8i3.36770
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Dilemmas of Moral Autonomy in the Transfer of Human Consciousness to AI

Denis Chiriac
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The Dilemmas of Moral Autonomy in the Transfer of Human Consciousness to AI

Denis Chiriac
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the dilemmas of moral autonomy in the context of the transfer of human consciousness to AI, focusing on the transhumanist archetype Homo Evolutus. Through comparative analysis, the study explores two distinct paradigms: the secular approach, rooted in Kantian philosophy, which considers that moral autonomy can be preserved through transfer; and the religious perspective (Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodox), which argues that the human person is an essential unity of body and soul, making the transfer conceptually impossible. The study highlights three central dilemmas: the authenticity of digital moral reflection, the distribution of responsibility between the biological and digital selves, and the limits of autonomy in human-AI integration. The secular paradigm perpetuates Cartesian dualism, while the theological perspective asserts that consciousness transfer raises fundamental ontological problems that cannot be solved by secular approaches alone. The conclusion emphasizes the need for an interdisciplinary approach that includes theological aspects to clarify what it means to be a moral agent in a technologically altered world.

Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and SocietyVol. 8(3)
Moldova State University (MD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.