Precedent-Based Professional Role Ethics for AI Decision Analysis

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used in professional fields such as healthcare, law, and engineering. In these domains, errors can lead to serious consequences. Many current AI ethics approaches do not reflect the structured codes and precedent-informed reasoning that guide professional conduct. This work introduces ProEthica, a system under development that combines LLMs with role-based ontologies to support structured ethical reasoning in professional settings. The system draws on principles from professional role ethics and incorporates ethical guidelines, practice standards, and prior case decisions. As a demonstration case, it applies the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) Code of Ethics and Board of Ethical Review precedents. ProEthica includes an ontology based on engineering ethics, a precedent retrieval method using both vector similarity and ontological mappings, a framework for guiding and checking LLM outputs with structured constraints, and a validation process modeled on FIRAC (Facts, Issues, Rules, Analysis, Conclusion) reasoning. The system is intended to help professionals make ethical decisions that are consistent with established standards, not to replace human judgment. Preliminary evaluations using NSPE cases indicate that it can retrieve relevant precedents and produce structured analyses that align with engineering ethics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aies.v8i3.36794
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Precedent-Based Professional Role Ethics for AI Decision Analysis

Christopher B. Rauch
Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Precedent-Based Professional Role Ethics for AI Decision Analysis

Christopher B. Rauch
article en

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used in professional fields such as healthcare, law, and engineering. In these domains, errors can lead to serious consequences. Many current AI ethics approaches do not reflect the structured codes and precedent-informed reasoning that guide professional conduct. This work introduces ProEthica, a system under development that combines LLMs with role-based ontologies to support structured ethical reasoning in professional settings. The system draws on principles from professional role ethics and incorporates ethical guidelines, practice standards, and prior case decisions. As a demonstration case, it applies the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) Code of Ethics and Board of Ethical Review precedents. ProEthica includes an ontology based on engineering ethics, a precedent retrieval method using both vector similarity and ontological mappings, a framework for guiding and checking LLM outputs with structured constraints, and a validation process modeled on FIRAC (Facts, Issues, Rules, Analysis, Conclusion) reasoning. The system is intended to help professionals make ethical decisions that are consistent with established standards, not to replace human judgment. Preliminary evaluations using NSPE cases indicate that it can retrieve relevant precedents and produce structured analyses that align with engineering ethics.

Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and SocietyVol. 8(3)
Drexel University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.