Four-part proximal humerus fractures treated with osteosynthesis and reverse shoulder arthroplasty: mid-term results

Background. Four-part fractures of the proximal humerus (PHF) present great difficulties in selecting an appropriate treatment method. The aim of the study — to compare the mid-term clinical outcomes of surgical treatment in patients with four-part fractures of the surgical neck of the humerus after uncomplicated osteosynthesis and arthroplasty, using the results of a newly developed subjective outcome assessment system. Methods. The retrospective study included patients aged 18 to 90 years with four-part fractures and fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus, with injury duration of up to 14 days. Patients were divided into two groups: the osteosynthesis group (O, n = 23) and the arthroplasty group (A, n = 25). In both groups, 12 months after the surgery, we conducted a survey using a specially developed subjective assessment system. Results. No significant difference was found between the groups in the subjective assessment of treatment outcomes one year after osteosynthesis of PHF and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. However, in patients from both groups, different criteria were identified as more significant in subjective assessment of the fracture treatment outcome. In A group, following criteria were significant: restricted range of motion in the upper limb and the percentage of functional recovery of the upper limb. In O group, the most prognostically important criteria for treatment assessment were the VAS point and the patients’ self-assessment of their contribution to the rehabilitation of the operated arm after surgery. Conclusion. In four-part fractures of the proximal humerus, plate osteosynthesis can be expected to yield treatment outcomes comparable to those of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Our study highlights the importance of subjective assessment of quality of life and patient satisfaction, which have become key components in clinical decision-making in the treatment of four-part fractures of the proximal humerus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17816/2311-2905-17722
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Four-part proximal humerus fractures treated with osteosynthesis and reverse shoulder arthroplasty: mid-term results

N. M. Kondyrev, K. A. Egiazaryan, D. S. Ershov, И. В. Михайлов et al.
Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
article

Four-part proximal humerus fractures treated with osteosynthesis and reverse shoulder arthroplasty: mid-term results

N. M. Kondyrev, K. A. Egiazaryan, D. S. Ershov, И. В. Михайлов, Ekaterina P. Tychina
article en

Abstract

Background. Four-part fractures of the proximal humerus (PHF) present great difficulties in selecting an appropriate treatment method. The aim of the study — to compare the mid-term clinical outcomes of surgical treatment in patients with four-part fractures of the surgical neck of the humerus after uncomplicated osteosynthesis and arthroplasty, using the results of a newly developed subjective outcome assessment system. Methods. The retrospective study included patients aged 18 to 90 years with four-part fractures and fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus, with injury duration of up to 14 days. Patients were divided into two groups: the osteosynthesis group (O, n = 23) and the arthroplasty group (A, n = 25). In both groups, 12 months after the surgery, we conducted a survey using a specially developed subjective assessment system. Results. No significant difference was found between the groups in the subjective assessment of treatment outcomes one year after osteosynthesis of PHF and reverse shoulder arthroplasty. However, in patients from both groups, different criteria were identified as more significant in subjective assessment of the fracture treatment outcome. In A group, following criteria were significant: restricted range of motion in the upper limb and the percentage of functional recovery of the upper limb. In O group, the most prognostically important criteria for treatment assessment were the VAS point and the patients’ self-assessment of their contribution to the rehabilitation of the operated arm after surgery. Conclusion. In four-part fractures of the proximal humerus, plate osteosynthesis can be expected to yield treatment outcomes comparable to those of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Our study highlights the importance of subjective assessment of quality of life and patient satisfaction, which have become key components in clinical decision-making in the treatment of four-part fractures of the proximal humerus.

Traumatology and Orthopedics of RussiaVol. 31(4)
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.