Comparison of wushu coach training systems in Türkiye and China

This study aims to compare the educational approaches, standards, programme contents and processes of Wushu coaching education systems in Turkey and China, and to offer suggestions that will contribute to the process of training Wushu coaches in Turkey. This research includes a one-to-one comparison approach based on document analysis. It is conducted in accordance with the qualitative research model. In this context, the current research design includes comparative analyses to find answers to the common criteria determined by Gök and Aslan (2019). As a result, this comparative analysis on wushu coaching education and related regulations in China and Türkiye revealed that both countries show many similarities and differences in this field. These differences stem from the social, cultural and administrative structures of the two countries and affect the development of wushu coaching. China and Türkiye have different approaches in many factors, such as authorisation to organise training, course models, level systems, participation conditions, employment processes, and equivalence procedures, and this situation has different effects on the development of wushu coaching. Therefore, China and Türkiye sharing their experiences in the field of wushu coaching with each other and conducting joint studies can make significant contributions to the further development of both wushu sport and coaching education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education science and sports.
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70053/esas.1641558
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of wushu coach training systems in Türkiye and China

Betül Altınok, Osman Yıldız
Education science and sports.
Physical Education and Pedagogy
article

Comparison of wushu coach training systems in Türkiye and China

Betül Altınok, Osman Yıldız
article en

Abstract

This study aims to compare the educational approaches, standards, programme contents and processes of Wushu coaching education systems in Turkey and China, and to offer suggestions that will contribute to the process of training Wushu coaches in Turkey. This research includes a one-to-one comparison approach based on document analysis. It is conducted in accordance with the qualitative research model. In this context, the current research design includes comparative analyses to find answers to the common criteria determined by Gök and Aslan (2019). As a result, this comparative analysis on wushu coaching education and related regulations in China and Türkiye revealed that both countries show many similarities and differences in this field. These differences stem from the social, cultural and administrative structures of the two countries and affect the development of wushu coaching. China and Türkiye have different approaches in many factors, such as authorisation to organise training, course models, level systems, participation conditions, employment processes, and equivalence procedures, and this situation has different effects on the development of wushu coaching. Therefore, China and Türkiye sharing their experiences in the field of wushu coaching with each other and conducting joint studies can make significant contributions to the further development of both wushu sport and coaching education.

Education science and sports.Vol. 7(2)
Kütahya Dumlupınar Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Physical Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.