The Turkish Straits in British Strategy (1774-1923): Geography Balancing the Ottoman Empire, Britain, and Russia

This article examines the strategic impact of geography on British foreign policy-making through the case of the Turkish Straits. It argues that geography functioned as a structural modifier, which shaped Britain’s long-term diplomatic and military strategy between two contrasting paradigms. These are the policies of closure of the Straits, designed to contain Russia, and the policy of freedom, intended to preserve British naval access. Drawing on diplomatic records and treaty developments from the late 18th century through the post-World War I period, the study shows how Britain’s shifting approaches to the Straits were driven not merely by immediate geopolitical changes but by persistent geographic constraints. The findings demonstrate the enduring influence of geographic chokepoints in shaping the logic and limits of great power diplomacy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kadim
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54462/kadim.1720292
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Turkish Straits in British Strategy (1774-1923): Geography Balancing the Ottoman Empire, Britain, and Russia

İsmail Ediz
Kadim
International Relations and Foreign Policy
article

The Turkish Straits in British Strategy (1774-1923): Geography Balancing the Ottoman Empire, Britain, and Russia

İsmail Ediz
article en

Abstract

This article examines the strategic impact of geography on British foreign policy-making through the case of the Turkish Straits. It argues that geography functioned as a structural modifier, which shaped Britain’s long-term diplomatic and military strategy between two contrasting paradigms. These are the policies of closure of the Straits, designed to contain Russia, and the policy of freedom, intended to preserve British naval access. Drawing on diplomatic records and treaty developments from the late 18th century through the post-World War I period, the study shows how Britain’s shifting approaches to the Straits were driven not merely by immediate geopolitical changes but by persistent geographic constraints. The findings demonstrate the enduring influence of geographic chokepoints in shaping the logic and limits of great power diplomacy.

Kadim(10)
Sakarya University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.