Rigorous evaluation of five models for e‐diary‐only seizure forecasting: Retrospective and prospective datasets do not outperform the Napkin method

Clinically effective seizure forecasting (i.e., beyond the Napkin method) for 24-h risk using e-diaries alone may be infeasible with currently available techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epilepsia
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18677
Citations
3
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rigorous evaluation of five models for e‐diary‐only seizure forecasting: Retrospective and prospective datasets do not outperform the Napkin method

Michael Brandon Westover, Robert Moss, Chi-Yuan Chang, Daniel M. Goldenholz
3 citations
Epilepsia
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
4.29
article

Rigorous evaluation of five models for e‐diary‐only seizure forecasting: Retrospective and prospective datasets do not outperform the Napkin method

Michael Brandon Westover, Robert Moss, Chi-Yuan Chang, Daniel M. Goldenholz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Clinically effective seizure forecasting (i.e., beyond the Napkin method) for 24-h risk using e-diaries alone may be infeasible with currently available techniques.

EpilepsiaVol. 67(2)
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), College Track (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
4.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.