Radiographic Outcomes After Growing Rod Treatment in Early-Onset Scoliosis: With Versus Without Final Fusion Surgery

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is often treated with growing rods, which use distraction-based correction to control deformity while allowing spinal growth. Although effective in the coronal plane, this technique may adversely affect sagittal alignment, particularly thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis. Whether final fusion surgery is necessary after the growing rod treatment remains controversial. This study compared radiographic outcomes, including coronal and sagittal parameters, between patients with and without final fusion to clarify the value of final fusion. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively reviewed 19 EOS patients treated with growing rods between 2015 and 2019. Patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion after lengthening were classified as the final fusion group (n = 9), while those with more than 12 months of follow-up without fusion formed the graduated group (n = 10). Demographics, surgical variables, and radiographic parameters (Cobb angle, correction rate, coronal balance, clavicular angle, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis) were compared. <b>Results</b>: Baseline characteristics were similar. At final follow-up, the final fusion group had significantly better outcomes in Cobb angle (24.2° vs. 34.9°, <i>p</i> = 0.002), correction rate (66.6% vs. 40.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.001), and coronal balance (-1.5 mm vs. 19.7 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.004). Sagittal alignment did not differ significantly, but preservation of thoracic kyphosis tended to favor the fusion group. <b>Conclusions</b>: Final fusion surgery after growing rod treatment achieved superior coronal correction and balance compared with observation alone. Although sagittal alignment was not statistically different, a trend toward better thoracic kyphosis preservation was observed. Final fusion should be considered for larger residual curves or coronal imbalance, while observation may suffice in well-corrected cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14207184
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiographic Outcomes After Growing Rod Treatment in Early-Onset Scoliosis: With Versus Without Final Fusion Surgery

Yunjin Nam, Jungwook Lim, Jae Hyuk Yang, Seung Woo Suh et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
article

Radiographic Outcomes After Growing Rod Treatment in Early-Onset Scoliosis: With Versus Without Final Fusion Surgery

Yunjin Nam, Jungwook Lim, Jae Hyuk Yang, Seung Woo Suh, Sang-Min Lee, Udit Patel
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is often treated with growing rods, which use distraction-based correction to control deformity while allowing spinal growth. Although effective in the coronal plane, this technique may adversely affect sagittal alignment, particularly thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis. Whether final fusion surgery is necessary after the growing rod treatment remains controversial. This study compared radiographic outcomes, including coronal and sagittal parameters, between patients with and without final fusion to clarify the value of final fusion. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively reviewed 19 EOS patients treated with growing rods between 2015 and 2019. Patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion after lengthening were classified as the final fusion group (n = 9), while those with more than 12 months of follow-up without fusion formed the graduated group (n = 10). Demographics, surgical variables, and radiographic parameters (Cobb angle, correction rate, coronal balance, clavicular angle, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis) were compared. <b>Results</b>: Baseline characteristics were similar. At final follow-up, the final fusion group had significantly better outcomes in Cobb angle (24.2° vs. 34.9°, <i>p</i> = 0.002), correction rate (66.6% vs. 40.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.001), and coronal balance (-1.5 mm vs. 19.7 mm, <i>p</i> = 0.004). Sagittal alignment did not differ significantly, but preservation of thoracic kyphosis tended to favor the fusion group. <b>Conclusions</b>: Final fusion surgery after growing rod treatment achieved superior coronal correction and balance compared with observation alone. Although sagittal alignment was not statistically different, a trend toward better thoracic kyphosis preservation was observed. Final fusion should be considered for larger residual curves or coronal imbalance, while observation may suffice in well-corrected cases.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(20)
Korea University Medical Center (KR)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.