The Estate as a Space of Memory in the Works of A.P. Chekhov and I.A. Bunin

This article examines the problem of the mnemonic representation of the estate in the works of A.P. Chekhov and I.A. Bunin. By the late 19th century, the estate lifestyle gradually lost its contemporary relevance and came to be perceived through the prism of memory – its possibilities and limitations interpreted differently by the two writers. Among Chekhov’s texts analyzed are the stories “In the Home District”, “A Visit with Friends”, “Verochka”, “The House with the Mezzanine”, “Ariadne”, “Gooseberries”, “The Bride”, “At the Manor”, and the comedy “The Cherry Orchard”. Employing the terminology proposed by M.V. Stroganov, Chekhov’s “estate” works distinguish between autochthonous characters (native inhabitants of the estate) and transient characters (those visiting the estate in passing). Autochthons are characterized by the reproduction of familiar social practices (automatic memory) coupled with painful nostalgia. Transient characters idealize the estate but swiftly abandon their fantasies when confronted with reality, readily forgetting the estate past. This tense opposition between character types is absent in Bunin’s works (“Late Spring”, “The Life of Arseniev”, “Wanderings”, “Dry Valley”). Here, the subject of memory is an involuntary wanderer – an autochthon who, under new historical conditions, has no prospect of return. Whereas memory can confound Chekhov’s characters, becoming a source of illusions and delusions, for Bunin’s characters it functions as a kind of “anchor point” (P. Nora) within the relentless flow of history. Bunin crosses a historical threshold beyond which mnemonic attachment to the estate is conceived not only as safe but as redemptive. In Chekhov’s prose, this attachment proves as unreliable as a predictive gaze into an uncertain “post-estate” future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vestnik of Kostroma State University
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2025-31-3-33-40
Primary Topic
Logistics and Transportation Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Estate as a Space of Memory in the Works of A.P. Chekhov and I.A. Bunin

Andrey E. Agratin
Vestnik of Kostroma State University
Logistics and Transportation Systems
article

The Estate as a Space of Memory in the Works of A.P. Chekhov and I.A. Bunin

Andrey E. Agratin
article en

Abstract

This article examines the problem of the mnemonic representation of the estate in the works of A.P. Chekhov and I.A. Bunin. By the late 19th century, the estate lifestyle gradually lost its contemporary relevance and came to be perceived through the prism of memory – its possibilities and limitations interpreted differently by the two writers. Among Chekhov’s texts analyzed are the stories “In the Home District”, “A Visit with Friends”, “Verochka”, “The House with the Mezzanine”, “Ariadne”, “Gooseberries”, “The Bride”, “At the Manor”, and the comedy “The Cherry Orchard”. Employing the terminology proposed by M.V. Stroganov, Chekhov’s “estate” works distinguish between autochthonous characters (native inhabitants of the estate) and transient characters (those visiting the estate in passing). Autochthons are characterized by the reproduction of familiar social practices (automatic memory) coupled with painful nostalgia. Transient characters idealize the estate but swiftly abandon their fantasies when confronted with reality, readily forgetting the estate past. This tense opposition between character types is absent in Bunin’s works (“Late Spring”, “The Life of Arseniev”, “Wanderings”, “Dry Valley”). Here, the subject of memory is an involuntary wanderer – an autochthon who, under new historical conditions, has no prospect of return. Whereas memory can confound Chekhov’s characters, becoming a source of illusions and delusions, for Bunin’s characters it functions as a kind of “anchor point” (P. Nora) within the relentless flow of history. Bunin crosses a historical threshold beyond which mnemonic attachment to the estate is conceived not only as safe but as redemptive. In Chekhov’s prose, this attachment proves as unreliable as a predictive gaze into an uncertain “post-estate” future.

Vestnik of Kostroma State UniversityVol. 31(3)
Gorky Institute of World Literature (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Logistics and Transportation Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Estate as a Space of Memory in the Works of A.P. Chekhov and I.A. Bunin — Andrey E. Agratin · Vestnik of Kostroma State University (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS