Access to essential medicines during the Sudanese civil war: a cross-sectional study

Essential medicines are those that meet the primary healthcare needs of the population. During the current Sudan war, access to these medicines is critical for evaluating the quality of the healthcare system in the aftermath of this crisis. This study aims to evaluate the availability and affordability of essential medicines in primary healthcare centers in Sudan. Additionally, it seeks to assess patients’ perceptions of the affordability, accessibility, acceptability, and impact of war on medicines in public healthcare facilities. We conducted a cross-sectional study across 35 primary healthcare centers in five of the seven safe states in Sudan. At each center’s dispensary unit, a standardized checklist was used to evaluate the availability, affordability, and storage conditions of 19 essential medicines chosen from Sudan’s national essential medicines list. Additionally, 975 patients from all dispensary units in the selected states were interviewed upon exiting to assess their perceptions of the accessibility, acceptability, accommodation, affordability, and impact of war on these medicines. Data were collected using the Kobo Toolbox and analyzed with SPSS version 26. The overall availability of essential medicines was 45.1%. Treatment costs exceeded the daily wage for insured patients in 8 out of 19 medications and for uninsured patients in 18 out of 19. The average median price ratio was 39.3 with insurance and 187.1 without insurance. Accessibility, affordability, accommodation, and acceptability ratings were 3.16/5, 1.02/4, 4.24/6, and 5.42/6, respectively. Only 14.3% of outlets had functioning storerooms, though dispensary areas were generally in good condition. Sudanese patients during the recent war had limited access to essential drugs due to high prices and low availability. The outcomes for the patients’ access variables (accessibility, accommodation, acceptability, and affordability) were comparable to those in low-income countries. Immediate action is critical to guarantee access to affordable medicines, especially since many families have lost their primary sources of income.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02647-4
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Access to essential medicines during the Sudanese civil war: a cross-sectional study

Mohammed Haydar Awad, Fatima Mohammed, Lina Hemmeda, Salma S. Alrawa et al.
International Journal for Equity in Health
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
article

Access to essential medicines during the Sudanese civil war: a cross-sectional study

Mohammed Haydar Awad, Fatima Mohammed, Lina Hemmeda, Salma S. Alrawa, Eman Hamad, Tarteel Abbas Abaker Joda, Mai Fathi Awadalla Alsedig, Gasm Alseed Abdelmonim Gasm Alseed Fadlalmoula, Ahmed Balla M. Ahmed, Muhannad Bushra Masaad Ahmed, Maha Rhamttallah, DarElsalam Kowa Hussein Abukhris, Doaa Kamal Eldeen Esmaiel Suliman
article en

Abstract

Essential medicines are those that meet the primary healthcare needs of the population. During the current Sudan war, access to these medicines is critical for evaluating the quality of the healthcare system in the aftermath of this crisis. This study aims to evaluate the availability and affordability of essential medicines in primary healthcare centers in Sudan. Additionally, it seeks to assess patients’ perceptions of the affordability, accessibility, acceptability, and impact of war on medicines in public healthcare facilities. We conducted a cross-sectional study across 35 primary healthcare centers in five of the seven safe states in Sudan. At each center’s dispensary unit, a standardized checklist was used to evaluate the availability, affordability, and storage conditions of 19 essential medicines chosen from Sudan’s national essential medicines list. Additionally, 975 patients from all dispensary units in the selected states were interviewed upon exiting to assess their perceptions of the accessibility, acceptability, accommodation, affordability, and impact of war on these medicines. Data were collected using the Kobo Toolbox and analyzed with SPSS version 26. The overall availability of essential medicines was 45.1%. Treatment costs exceeded the daily wage for insured patients in 8 out of 19 medications and for uninsured patients in 18 out of 19. The average median price ratio was 39.3 with insurance and 187.1 without insurance. Accessibility, affordability, accommodation, and acceptability ratings were 3.16/5, 1.02/4, 4.24/6, and 5.42/6, respectively. Only 14.3% of outlets had functioning storerooms, though dispensary areas were generally in good condition. Sudanese patients during the recent war had limited access to essential drugs due to high prices and low availability. The outcomes for the patients’ access variables (accessibility, accommodation, acceptability, and affordability) were comparable to those in low-income countries. Immediate action is critical to guarantee access to affordable medicines, especially since many families have lost their primary sources of income.

International Journal for Equity in HealthVol. 24(1)
University of Khartoum (SD), Shendi University (SD), Gadarif University (SD), Karary University (SD), University of Kordofan (SD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.