Upcycling Strategies for Resilience Reconstruction Goals: A Case Study of an Italian Public Building

This study examines the economic and financial implications of the upcycling process and Design for Disassembly (DfD) applied to an “authorial” building. The objective is to examine the economic benefits deriving from the reuse of construction materials by quantifying the savings obtained through the reduction of disposal costs and CO2 emissions in comparison with a traditional linear economic model. The methodological approach has been developed with the aid of Building Information Modeling (BIM) in order to provide an accurate estimation of both costs and environmental impacts related to the disassembly and reuse of materials. The financial analysis is based on local market prices to assess the savings associated with the reuse of building components compared to their disposal in landfills. The case study demonstrates the feasibility of this approach under real conditions, underscoring the transformative potential of upcycling in the construction industry, highlighting how this strategy can simultaneously improve economic efficiency and reduce environmental impact. The research offers a significant contribution to the debate on sustainable building practices and may serve as a starting point for future investigations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203683
Primary Topic
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Upcycling Strategies for Resilience Reconstruction Goals: A Case Study of an Italian Public Building

Francesco Tajani, Endriol Doko, Alberto Bologna, Francesco Sica et al.
Buildings
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
article

Upcycling Strategies for Resilience Reconstruction Goals: A Case Study of an Italian Public Building

Francesco Tajani, Endriol Doko, Alberto Bologna, Francesco Sica, Giuseppe Cerullo
article en

Abstract

This study examines the economic and financial implications of the upcycling process and Design for Disassembly (DfD) applied to an “authorial” building. The objective is to examine the economic benefits deriving from the reuse of construction materials by quantifying the savings obtained through the reduction of disposal costs and CO2 emissions in comparison with a traditional linear economic model. The methodological approach has been developed with the aid of Building Information Modeling (BIM) in order to provide an accurate estimation of both costs and environmental impacts related to the disassembly and reuse of materials. The financial analysis is based on local market prices to assess the savings associated with the reuse of building components compared to their disposal in landfills. The case study demonstrates the feasibility of this approach under real conditions, underscoring the transformative potential of upcycling in the construction industry, highlighting how this strategy can simultaneously improve economic efficiency and reduce environmental impact. The research offers a significant contribution to the debate on sustainable building practices and may serve as a starting point for future investigations.

BuildingsVol. 15(20)
Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Upcycling Strategies for Resilience Reconstruction Goals: A Case Study of an Italian Public Building — Francesco Tajani, Endriol Doko, et al. · Buildings (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS