Why does debunking information fall on “deaf ears”? A study on the backfire effect of health rumor corrections among older adults

With the rise of age-friendly digital tools, older adults increasingly access health information online. Yet weakened gatekeeping in digital media has facilitated the spread of health rumors. Corrective efforts sometimes backfire, reinforcing belief in misinformation-a phenomenon known as the backfire effect. This study explores its formation among older adults via semi-structured interviews with 22 participants. Using grounded theory and integrating the Stressor-Strain-Outcome (SSO) framework with the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), it identifies two pathways: worldview and familiarity backfire effects. Findings reveal how cognitive dissonance, emotional defense, and individual traits shape resistance to corrections. The study proposes targeted strategies involving message design, social communication, psychological inoculation, and digital literacy. It offers insights into improving health misinformation correction for aging populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Psychology
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251379834
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why does debunking information fall on “deaf ears”? A study on the backfire effect of health rumor corrections among older adults

Chenyu Gu
Journal of Health Psychology
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Why does debunking information fall on “deaf ears”? A study on the backfire effect of health rumor corrections among older adults

Chenyu Gu
article en

Abstract

With the rise of age-friendly digital tools, older adults increasingly access health information online. Yet weakened gatekeeping in digital media has facilitated the spread of health rumors. Corrective efforts sometimes backfire, reinforcing belief in misinformation-a phenomenon known as the backfire effect. This study explores its formation among older adults via semi-structured interviews with 22 participants. Using grounded theory and integrating the Stressor-Strain-Outcome (SSO) framework with the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), it identifies two pathways: worldview and familiarity backfire effects. Findings reveal how cognitive dissonance, emotional defense, and individual traits shape resistance to corrections. The study proposes targeted strategies involving message design, social communication, psychological inoculation, and digital literacy. It offers insights into improving health misinformation correction for aging populations.

Journal of Health PsychologyVol. 30(14)
Minjiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why does debunking information fall on “deaf ears”? A study on the backfire effect of health rumor corrections among older adults — Chenyu Gu · Journal of Health Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS