Energy Solidarity: Channelling and Restraining Legal Power in the Transition of the Energy Sector for a Successful European Green Deal

This article explores the application of the principle of energy solidarity in the EU's post-crisis energy law in light of its recognition by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in its seminal OPAL judgment in July 2021. The article argues that EU secondary law has yet to unpack the full potential of the energy solidarity principle. So far, it remains strongly tied to security of supply. Despite first attempts, it has not yet been anchored in secondary legislation oriented towards the priorities of EU energy policy in the area of climate change mitigation. Given recent proceedings before and judgments of the CJEU, however, such an extension of the solidarity principle may only be a matter of time, although there is uncertainty as to the effect of this development: as a context-dependent principle, energy solidarity could reinforce, but also restrain, decarbonisation efforts of the Member States and the EU.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of European Administrative Law
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7590/187479825x17562060647889
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Energy Solidarity: Channelling and Restraining Legal Power in the Transition of the Energy Sector for a Successful European Green Deal

P.S. Abel, Max Münchmeyer
1 citations
Review of European Administrative Law
Environmental law and policy
15.98
article

Energy Solidarity: Channelling and Restraining Legal Power in the Transition of the Energy Sector for a Successful European Green Deal

P.S. Abel, Max Münchmeyer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article explores the application of the principle of energy solidarity in the EU's post-crisis energy law in light of its recognition by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in its seminal OPAL judgment in July 2021. The article argues that EU secondary law has yet to unpack the full potential of the energy solidarity principle. So far, it remains strongly tied to security of supply. Despite first attempts, it has not yet been anchored in secondary legislation oriented towards the priorities of EU energy policy in the area of climate change mitigation. Given recent proceedings before and judgments of the CJEU, however, such an extension of the solidarity principle may only be a matter of time, although there is uncertainty as to the effect of this development: as a context-dependent principle, energy solidarity could reinforce, but also restrain, decarbonisation efforts of the Member States and the EU.

Review of European Administrative LawVol. 18(2)
Universität Innsbruck (AT), European University Institute (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Environmental law and policy
15.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Energy Solidarity: Channelling and Restraining Legal Power in the Transition of the Energy Sector for a Successful European Green Deal — P.S. Abel, Max Münchmeyer · Review of European Administrative Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS