Unravelling the nature of 'Do No Significant Harm': an emerging principle of EU environmental law or a transformative tool for the green economy?

This article critically examines the 'Do No Significant Harm' (DNSH) principle as introduced in the EU legal order with the European Green Deal and developed through EU secondary legislation. While the DNSH principle has become increasingly central in the EU's sustainable finance and is emerging as a condition for accessing EU funds, its legal nature and conceptual clarity remain ambiguous. To this end, this article aims to discuss whether the DNSH principle constitute a legal principle within EU environmental law and to explore its added value in promoting environmental sustainability in view of its emerging prominence as a horizontal tool and funding criterion. This article begins by tracing the development of the DNSH principle, from its origins in international law to its articulation in the European Green Deal and its incorporation into EU secondary legislation, particularly in the areas of sustainable finance (Taxonomy Regulation, Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation, Benchmarks Regulation) and the Recovery and Resilience Facility. The aim is to identify commonalities and divergences in how DNSH is implemented across these instruments, in order to assess its legal nature. Following this, the article evaluates the position of DNSH within the broader framework of EU environmental principles as set out in Articles 11 and 191 TFEU, aiming to further clarify its legal nature and function. Finally, it considers DNSH's contribution to internal coherence across environmental objectives, arguing that it adds concrete value by enhancing consistency and integration within EU environmental policy. The analysis ultimately suggests that, despite its legal codification and frequent reference as a 'principle', DNSH is better understood as a horizontal assessment tool, transformative in practice but conceptually distinct from the traditional principles of EU environmental law.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of European Administrative Law
Published
2025-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7590/187479825x17562060647898
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unravelling the nature of 'Do No Significant Harm': an emerging principle of EU environmental law or a transformative tool for the green economy?

Eduardo Silva-Pavez
Review of European Administrative Law
Environmental law and policy
article

Unravelling the nature of 'Do No Significant Harm': an emerging principle of EU environmental law or a transformative tool for the green economy?

Eduardo Silva-Pavez
article en

Abstract

This article critically examines the 'Do No Significant Harm' (DNSH) principle as introduced in the EU legal order with the European Green Deal and developed through EU secondary legislation. While the DNSH principle has become increasingly central in the EU's sustainable finance and is emerging as a condition for accessing EU funds, its legal nature and conceptual clarity remain ambiguous. To this end, this article aims to discuss whether the DNSH principle constitute a legal principle within EU environmental law and to explore its added value in promoting environmental sustainability in view of its emerging prominence as a horizontal tool and funding criterion. This article begins by tracing the development of the DNSH principle, from its origins in international law to its articulation in the European Green Deal and its incorporation into EU secondary legislation, particularly in the areas of sustainable finance (Taxonomy Regulation, Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation, Benchmarks Regulation) and the Recovery and Resilience Facility. The aim is to identify commonalities and divergences in how DNSH is implemented across these instruments, in order to assess its legal nature. Following this, the article evaluates the position of DNSH within the broader framework of EU environmental principles as set out in Articles 11 and 191 TFEU, aiming to further clarify its legal nature and function. Finally, it considers DNSH's contribution to internal coherence across environmental objectives, arguing that it adds concrete value by enhancing consistency and integration within EU environmental policy. The analysis ultimately suggests that, despite its legal codification and frequent reference as a 'principle', DNSH is better understood as a horizontal assessment tool, transformative in practice but conceptually distinct from the traditional principles of EU environmental law.

Review of European Administrative LawVol. 18(2)
College of Europe (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Environmental law and policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unravelling the nature of 'Do No Significant Harm': an emerging principle of EU environmental law or a transformative tool for the green economy? — Eduardo Silva-Pavez · Review of European Administrative Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS