Der sanfte Individualismus in den Theorien von Yamazaki Masakazu und Jürgen Habermas

Abstract The aim of this paper is to compare the theories of Yamazaki Masakazu und Jürgen Habermas. Yamazaki believed that the hard, ascetic individualism with a focus on production would alienate us from our humanity. He saw in a slowed down consumption a way out of this regressive development. Habermas on the other hand believed that system-oriented rationalization process would colonize the communication-oriented lifeworld. This negative trend could be overcome by developing a discourse free of power interference that enables consensus-building. This gentle individualism of Yamazaki and Habermas corresponds to a compromise between the extremes of a hard individualism (capitalism) and collectivism (communism or nationalism). The surprising result of the analysis is that Yamazaki’s theory is not only easier to realize than Habermas’s, but also more universally applicable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asiatische Studien – Études Asiatiques
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/asia-2023-0038
Primary Topic
Critical Theory and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Der sanfte Individualismus in den Theorien von Yamazaki Masakazu und Jürgen Habermas

Christian Etzrodt
Asiatische Studien – Études Asiatiques
Critical Theory and Philosophy
article

Der sanfte Individualismus in den Theorien von Yamazaki Masakazu und Jürgen Habermas

Christian Etzrodt
article en

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this paper is to compare the theories of Yamazaki Masakazu und Jürgen Habermas. Yamazaki believed that the hard, ascetic individualism with a focus on production would alienate us from our humanity. He saw in a slowed down consumption a way out of this regressive development. Habermas on the other hand believed that system-oriented rationalization process would colonize the communication-oriented lifeworld. This negative trend could be overcome by developing a discourse free of power interference that enables consensus-building. This gentle individualism of Yamazaki and Habermas corresponds to a compromise between the extremes of a hard individualism (capitalism) and collectivism (communism or nationalism). The surprising result of the analysis is that Yamazaki’s theory is not only easier to realize than Habermas’s, but also more universally applicable.

Asiatische Studien – Études AsiatiquesVol. 79(2)
Museum of Japanese Art Yamato Bunkakan (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Critical Theory and Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Der sanfte Individualismus in den Theorien von Yamazaki Masakazu und Jürgen Habermas — Christian Etzrodt · Asiatische Studien – Études Asiatiques (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS