Generative Modeling for Interpretable Anomaly Detection in Medical Imaging: Applications in Failure Detection and Data Curation

This work aims to leverage generative modeling-based anomaly detection to enhance interpretability in AI failure detection systems and to aid data curation for large repositories. For failure detection interpretability, this retrospective study utilized 3339 CT scans (525 patients), divided patient-wise into training, baseline test, and anomaly (having failure-causing attributes-e.g., needles, ascites) test datasets. For data curation, 112,120 ChestX-ray14 radiographs were used for training and 2036 radiographs from the Medical Imaging and Data Resource Center for testing, categorized as baseline or anomalous based on attribute alignment with ChestX-ray14. StyleGAN2 networks modeled the training distributions. Test images were reconstructed with backpropagation and scored using mean squared error (MSE) and Wasserstein distance (WD). Scores should be high for anomalous images, as StyleGAN2 cannot model unseen attributes. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) evaluated anomaly detection, i.e., baseline and anomaly dataset differentiation. The proportion of highest-scoring patches containing needles or ascites assessed anomaly localization. Permutation tests determined statistical significance. StyleGAN2 did not reconstruct anomalous attributes (e.g., needles, ascites), enabling the unsupervised detection of these attributes: mean (±standard deviation) AUROCs were 0.86 (±0.13) for failure detection and 0.82 (±0.11) for data curation. 81% (±13%) of the needles and ascites were localized. WD outperformed MSE on CT (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while MSE outperformed WD on radiography (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Generative models detected anomalous image attributes, demonstrating promise for model failure detection interpretability and large-scale data curation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12101106
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative Modeling for Interpretable Anomaly Detection in Medical Imaging: Applications in Failure Detection and Data Curation

Kristy K. Brock, Caleb S. O’Connor, Eugene J. Koay, Aashish C. Gupta et al.
1 citations
Bioengineering
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
2.48
article

Generative Modeling for Interpretable Anomaly Detection in Medical Imaging: Applications in Failure Detection and Data Curation

Kristy K. Brock, Caleb S. O’Connor, Eugene J. Koay, Aashish C. Gupta, Joshua P. Yung, Ankit Patel, Bruno Calazans Odisio, Clifton D. Fuller, McKell Woodland, Mais Altaie, Austin H. Castelo, Paul E. Kinahan, Olubunmi C. Lebimoyo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This work aims to leverage generative modeling-based anomaly detection to enhance interpretability in AI failure detection systems and to aid data curation for large repositories. For failure detection interpretability, this retrospective study utilized 3339 CT scans (525 patients), divided patient-wise into training, baseline test, and anomaly (having failure-causing attributes-e.g., needles, ascites) test datasets. For data curation, 112,120 ChestX-ray14 radiographs were used for training and 2036 radiographs from the Medical Imaging and Data Resource Center for testing, categorized as baseline or anomalous based on attribute alignment with ChestX-ray14. StyleGAN2 networks modeled the training distributions. Test images were reconstructed with backpropagation and scored using mean squared error (MSE) and Wasserstein distance (WD). Scores should be high for anomalous images, as StyleGAN2 cannot model unseen attributes. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) evaluated anomaly detection, i.e., baseline and anomaly dataset differentiation. The proportion of highest-scoring patches containing needles or ascites assessed anomaly localization. Permutation tests determined statistical significance. StyleGAN2 did not reconstruct anomalous attributes (e.g., needles, ascites), enabling the unsupervised detection of these attributes: mean (±standard deviation) AUROCs were 0.86 (±0.13) for failure detection and 0.82 (±0.11) for data curation. 81% (±13%) of the needles and ascites were localized. WD outperformed MSE on CT (<i>p</i> < 0.001), while MSE outperformed WD on radiography (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Generative models detected anomalous image attributes, demonstrating promise for model failure detection interpretability and large-scale data curation.

BioengineeringVol. 12(10)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), University of Washington (US), Texas Southern University (US), Rice University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.