Can autogenic landslide noise disrupt allogenic sedimentary signal transmission?

Allogenic forcing of sediment production generates sedimentary signals that we use to understand the past. These signals may be buffered or shredded by autogenic processes as they travel through sediment routing systems from source to sink. Studies on signal propagation tend to focus on either signal buffering by deterministic fluvial networks or signal shredding by stochastic processes. Stochastic processes generate noise that can obscure or degrade signals, especially below a threshold correlation timescale inherent to each process. It remains unclear whether this timescale exists when stochastically and deterministically modeled processes interact with each other. We address this knowledge gap by coupling stochastic landsliding and deterministic fluvial processes in a 2D numerical landscape evolution model in which we vary landslide frequency, sediment erodibility, and fluvial transport length scale to generate various dynamic steady state scenarios. We explore how the interaction of the landslide and fluvial processes affects landscape morphology and sediment export from the catchment. Though landslides produce instantaneous mass fluxes from hillslopes to channels, the deposited material can only be slowly evacuated by the fluvial system. This creates an emergent correlation timescale set by the residence time of landslide deposits. Efficient fluvial systems erode deposits faster and are more likely to transmit higher-frequency signals down-system. These results can be used to predict where paleo‐tectonic and paleo-climatic signals are more likely to be preserved in strata.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.176031318.87350544/v1
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can autogenic landslide noise disrupt allogenic sedimentary signal transmission?

K. M. Straub, Laurent O. Roberge, Frank J. Pazzaglia, Benjamin Campforts et al.
Landslides and related hazards
article

Can autogenic landslide noise disrupt allogenic sedimentary signal transmission?

K. M. Straub, Laurent O. Roberge, Frank J. Pazzaglia, Benjamin Campforts, N. M. Gasparini
article en

Abstract

Allogenic forcing of sediment production generates sedimentary signals that we use to understand the past. These signals may be buffered or shredded by autogenic processes as they travel through sediment routing systems from source to sink. Studies on signal propagation tend to focus on either signal buffering by deterministic fluvial networks or signal shredding by stochastic processes. Stochastic processes generate noise that can obscure or degrade signals, especially below a threshold correlation timescale inherent to each process. It remains unclear whether this timescale exists when stochastically and deterministically modeled processes interact with each other. We address this knowledge gap by coupling stochastic landsliding and deterministic fluvial processes in a 2D numerical landscape evolution model in which we vary landslide frequency, sediment erodibility, and fluvial transport length scale to generate various dynamic steady state scenarios. We explore how the interaction of the landslide and fluvial processes affects landscape morphology and sediment export from the catchment. Though landslides produce instantaneous mass fluxes from hillslopes to channels, the deposited material can only be slowly evacuated by the fluvial system. This creates an emergent correlation timescale set by the residence time of landslide deposits. Efficient fluvial systems erode deposits faster and are more likely to transmit higher-frequency signals down-system. These results can be used to predict where paleo‐tectonic and paleo-climatic signals are more likely to be preserved in strata.

Tulane University (US), Lehigh University (US), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Landslides and related hazards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.