Pipeline regulation for hydrogen: choosing between paths and networks

The reliance on hydrogen as part of the transition towards a low-carbon economy, will require developing dedicated pipeline infrastructure. This deployment will be shaped by regulatory frameworks governing investment and access conditions, ultimately structuring how the commodity is traded. The paper assesses the market design for hydrogen infrastructure, assuming the application of unbundling requirements. For this purpose, it develops a general economic framework for regulating pipeline infrastructure, focusing on asset specificity, market power and access rules. The paper assesses the scope of application of infrastructure regulation, which can be set to individual pipelines or to entire networks. When treated as entire networks, the infrastructure can provide flexibility to enhance market liquidity. However, this requires establishing network monopolies which rely on central planning and reduce the overall dynamic efficiency of the sector. The paper further compares the regulation applied to US and EU natural gas pipeline infrastructure. Based on the different challenges faced by the EU hydrogen sector, including absence of wholesale concentration and large infrastructure needs, the paper draws lessons for a regulatory framework establishing the main building blocks of a hydrogen target model. The paper recommends a review of the current EU regulatory framework in the Hydrogen and Decarbonised Gas Package to enable i) the application of regulation to individual pipelines rather than entire networks; ii) the use of negotiated third-party access, light-touch regulation and possibly market-based coordination mechanisms for the access to the infrastructure and, iii) a more significant role for long-term capacity contracts to underpin infrastructure investments. • Asset specificity, market power and access conditions key for regulating pipelines. • Regulation can be applied to individual pipelines or entire networks. • United States and European regulation applied to paths and networks, respectively. • Network-wide regulation might not suit the European hydrogen market. • Negotiated access applied to individual pipelines better suited for hydrogen.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Policy
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114846
Primary Topic
Electric Power System Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pipeline regulation for hydrogen: choosing between paths and networks

Antonio Hidalgo Nuchera, Chi Kong Chyong, Timothy Fitzgerald, M. Martínez‐Rodríguez et al.
Energy Policy
Electric Power System Optimization
article

Pipeline regulation for hydrogen: choosing between paths and networks

Antonio Hidalgo Nuchera, Chi Kong Chyong, Timothy Fitzgerald, M. Martínez‐Rodríguez, Miguel Vázquez
article en

Abstract

The reliance on hydrogen as part of the transition towards a low-carbon economy, will require developing dedicated pipeline infrastructure. This deployment will be shaped by regulatory frameworks governing investment and access conditions, ultimately structuring how the commodity is traded. The paper assesses the market design for hydrogen infrastructure, assuming the application of unbundling requirements. For this purpose, it develops a general economic framework for regulating pipeline infrastructure, focusing on asset specificity, market power and access rules. The paper assesses the scope of application of infrastructure regulation, which can be set to individual pipelines or to entire networks. When treated as entire networks, the infrastructure can provide flexibility to enhance market liquidity. However, this requires establishing network monopolies which rely on central planning and reduce the overall dynamic efficiency of the sector. The paper further compares the regulation applied to US and EU natural gas pipeline infrastructure. Based on the different challenges faced by the EU hydrogen sector, including absence of wholesale concentration and large infrastructure needs, the paper draws lessons for a regulatory framework establishing the main building blocks of a hydrogen target model. The paper recommends a review of the current EU regulatory framework in the Hydrogen and Decarbonised Gas Package to enable i) the application of regulation to individual pipelines rather than entire networks; ii) the use of negotiated third-party access, light-touch regulation and possibly market-based coordination mechanisms for the access to the infrastructure and, iii) a more significant role for long-term capacity contracts to underpin infrastructure investments. • Asset specificity, market power and access conditions key for regulating pipelines. • Regulation can be applied to individual pipelines or entire networks. • United States and European regulation applied to paths and networks, respectively. • Network-wide regulation might not suit the European hydrogen market. • Negotiated access applied to individual pipelines better suited for hydrogen.

Energy PolicyVol. 208
Global College (CY), Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (GB), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), Cooper Union (US), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Electric Power System Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.