Trust or Trickery? A Systematic Review of Greenwashing and Branding

This study aims to systematically review the relationship between greenwashing and branding, with a focus on how deceptive environmental claims influence brand trust, perceived authenticity, and consumer behaviour. It seeks to identify key trends, challenges, and opportunities in sustainable branding. A systematic review was conducted, analysing peer-reviewed articles, industry reports, and conference proceedings published between 2012 and 2024. Scopus, the largest citation and abstract database, was utilized. The selected studies addressing greenwashing and branding were further analysed using bibliometric tools. The findings reveal that greenwashing significantly erodes consumer trust and brand reputation, especially when misleading claims are uncovered. Consumer responses vary based on knowledge levels, with some easily persuaded by green claims and others critically evaluating brand messaging. Authenticity and transparency are found to be crucial in fostering sustainable branding and rebuilding consumer trust. This study synthesizes dispersed literature on greenwashing’s impact on branding, offering a consolidated bibliometric analysis that highlights evolving research patterns. It extends understanding by linking consumer scepticism, trust dynamics, and brand authenticity within the sustainability discourse. This review provides original insights by bridging greenwashing and branding literature systematically. It offers a comprehensive synthesis that benefits academics, marketers, and policymakers working to advance ethical and sustainable branding practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Review of Management and Marketing
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32479/irmm.20758
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability in Business
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust or Trickery? A Systematic Review of Greenwashing and Branding

Fahad Ali AlQahtani
International Review of Management and Marketing
Environmental Sustainability in Business
article

Trust or Trickery? A Systematic Review of Greenwashing and Branding

Fahad Ali AlQahtani
article en

Abstract

This study aims to systematically review the relationship between greenwashing and branding, with a focus on how deceptive environmental claims influence brand trust, perceived authenticity, and consumer behaviour. It seeks to identify key trends, challenges, and opportunities in sustainable branding. A systematic review was conducted, analysing peer-reviewed articles, industry reports, and conference proceedings published between 2012 and 2024. Scopus, the largest citation and abstract database, was utilized. The selected studies addressing greenwashing and branding were further analysed using bibliometric tools. The findings reveal that greenwashing significantly erodes consumer trust and brand reputation, especially when misleading claims are uncovered. Consumer responses vary based on knowledge levels, with some easily persuaded by green claims and others critically evaluating brand messaging. Authenticity and transparency are found to be crucial in fostering sustainable branding and rebuilding consumer trust. This study synthesizes dispersed literature on greenwashing’s impact on branding, offering a consolidated bibliometric analysis that highlights evolving research patterns. It extends understanding by linking consumer scepticism, trust dynamics, and brand authenticity within the sustainability discourse. This review provides original insights by bridging greenwashing and branding literature systematically. It offers a comprehensive synthesis that benefits academics, marketers, and policymakers working to advance ethical and sustainable branding practices.

International Review of Management and MarketingVol. 15(6)
King Khalid University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Environmental Sustainability in Business
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.