Peer effects and inequalities in technology uptake. Evidence from a large-scale renovation subsidy programme

The energy transition's success in addressing climate change depends on several factors, including the affordability of new technologies and the influence of peers within communities. However, concerns about affordability raise questions about how economic inequalities shape peer effects and whether they create barriers to equitable adoption. To this end, we explore how inequalities influence peer effects in the uptake of renewable heating sources. We leverage over 260,000 observations from unique and unpublished microdata from the Polish Clean Air Priority Programme – one of the largest retrofit schemes in Europe. Our results show that peer effects accelerate technology uptake, with each additional installation increasing the likelihood of subsequent adoption by 0.014 pp. This amounts to a 7.7 % aggregate increase in the probability of installations in the average 1-km grid cell attributable to peer spillovers. Peer influence is affected by economic inequality. In more economically homogeneous areas, affluent individuals considerably impact their peers. In areas with higher economic disparities, this influence diminishes. Our findings highlight the role of heating technology type and adopter wealth in shaping peer effect magnitude. Less wealthy adopters of biomass stoves emerge as a significant driver of peer influence, especially in areas with lower income inequality. We advise direct transfers to address technology adoption inequalities, leveraging social capital in low-inequality areas and adopting individualised strategies in high-inequality areas. • Economic inequality weakens peer effects in technology adoption decisions. • Peer influence on technology adoption varies by income inequality and wealth. • Progressive policies are needed to reduce disparities in technology uptake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Policy
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114902
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peer effects and inequalities in technology uptake. Evidence from a large-scale renovation subsidy programme

Jakub Sokołowski, Jan Frankowski, Karol Madoń
1 citations
Energy Policy
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
3.13
article

Peer effects and inequalities in technology uptake. Evidence from a large-scale renovation subsidy programme

Jakub Sokołowski, Jan Frankowski, Karol Madoń
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The energy transition's success in addressing climate change depends on several factors, including the affordability of new technologies and the influence of peers within communities. However, concerns about affordability raise questions about how economic inequalities shape peer effects and whether they create barriers to equitable adoption. To this end, we explore how inequalities influence peer effects in the uptake of renewable heating sources. We leverage over 260,000 observations from unique and unpublished microdata from the Polish Clean Air Priority Programme – one of the largest retrofit schemes in Europe. Our results show that peer effects accelerate technology uptake, with each additional installation increasing the likelihood of subsequent adoption by 0.014 pp. This amounts to a 7.7 % aggregate increase in the probability of installations in the average 1-km grid cell attributable to peer spillovers. Peer influence is affected by economic inequality. In more economically homogeneous areas, affluent individuals considerably impact their peers. In areas with higher economic disparities, this influence diminishes. Our findings highlight the role of heating technology type and adopter wealth in shaping peer effect magnitude. Less wealthy adopters of biomass stoves emerge as a significant driver of peer influence, especially in areas with lower income inequality. We advise direct transfers to address technology adoption inequalities, leveraging social capital in low-inequality areas and adopting individualised strategies in high-inequality areas. • Economic inequality weakens peer effects in technology adoption decisions. • Peer influence on technology adoption varies by income inequality and wealth. • Progressive policies are needed to reduce disparities in technology uptake.

Energy PolicyVol. 208
SGH Warsaw School of Economics (PL), European Regional Centre for Ecohydrology (PL), Institute for Structural Research (PL), University of Warsaw (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.