Maternal age and genome-wide failure of meiotic recombination are associated with triploid conceptions in humans
Triploid and haploid conceptions are not viable and are a common occurrence in humans, where they account for 10% of all pregnancy losses. Despite the parent of origin being important in the etiology of the pregnancy, our knowledge of their causes is limited, especially at the point of conception. Using a dataset of 96,660 biopsies and a validation dataset of 44,324 from human blastocyst embryos generated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection, we estimate that 1.1% of human conceptions (n = 1,063) contain extra or missing chromosome sets in zygotes. In our cohort of intracytoplasmic-sperm-injection-derived embryos, where the risk of polyspermy is inherently lower compared to natural conception, we identify for the first time a maternal age effect, with a 1.046-per-year increased risk in triploidy/haploidy (p < 0.001). In 0.03% of couples, we identified three or more triploid/haploid embryos, suggesting a personal risk effect (p = 0.03). Genotype analysis of 41 triploid embryo biopsies and their parents shows that around one-third of maternal triploid conceptions originate in meiosis I and two-thirds in meiosis II. Seven of these embryos are inferred to have entirely failed to initiate meiotic recombination genome wide, a surprising finding suggesting that human oocytes with pervasive meiotic recombination failure that are formed during fetal development are capable of ovulation in adult life. Finally, we identify a type of genome-wide maternal isodiploidy (two maternal chromosome sets) in 0.05% of embryos (41/74,009). Collectively, our findings shed light on the biology of meiosis and the formation of human oocytes with the number of chromosome sets.
Authors
- Francesca Mulas
- Ludovica Picchetta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4338-7224)
- Filippo Maria Ubaldi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6894-2147)
- Laura Rienzi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8104-3958)
- Emily Mounts
- T.A. Molinaro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8079-9876)
- Christine V. Whitehead
- Shai Carmi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0188-2610)
- Vaidehi Jobanputra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0962-7873)
- Juan A. García-Velasco (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1005-8727)
- D Babariya (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8263-0502)
- Antonio Capalbo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0109-323X)
- Eva R. Hoffmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2588-0652)
- Pavan Gill
- Christian S. Ottolini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8200-378X)
- Montse Pérez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1772-8984)
- Elvezia Maria Paraboschi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7935-798X)
- Xin Tao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1203-0015)
- António Pellicer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8254-863X)
- Yiping Zhan
- Carlos Marin Vallejo
Institutions
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- University of Teramo (IT)
- Universitat de València (ES)
- University of Urbino (IT)
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
- Valencian Infertility Institute (ES)
- Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey (US)
- IVI Madrid Clinic (ES)
- Information Visualization and Innovative Research (US)
- Genetic Alliance UK (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Institute for Reproductive Health (US)
- Clinica Valle Giulia (IT)
- Daiichi Sankyo (United States) (US)
- University College London (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The American Journal of Human Genetics
- Published
- 2025-10-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2025.09.014
- Primary Topic
- Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00