A Qualitative Exploration of Various Stigmas Impacting HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake Among African American Young Adults

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has promise for reducing racial/ethnic HIV disparities; yet, acceptance among African Americans remains low. PrEP-related stigmas may impact uptake, but this is understudied. This study examines mechanisms by which stigma impacts PrEP acceptance among various priority African American populations. Focus group data from 63 African American young adults (aged 18-29 years) in Louisville, Kentucky, explore how various stigmas impact attitudes toward PrEP. Data were analyzed using grounded theory analytic techniques. PrEP stigma, HIV stigma, sexual behavior stigma, and homophobia/transphobia individually reduce PrEP uptake. These stigmas also interact synergistically to undermine PrEP acceptance. Key challenges resulting from various stigmas and their interactions include medical hesitancy, lack of perceived susceptibility based on gender and sexuality, the role of gender norms in HIV prevention, and deprioritizing HIV prevention due to social rejection. Interventions to increase awareness, destigmatize PrEP, remediate social marginalization related to identity, HIV status, and gendered perceptions of sexual risk, as well as more focus on diverse priority groups, are needed to present PrEP as a viable HIV prevention option for African American communities. More research is needed to optimize strategies that address stigma and increase acceptance of novel HIV prevention technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-04-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/42c2-p626
Primary Topic
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Qualitative Exploration of Various Stigmas Impacting HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake Among African American Young Adults

Isabel Rozema, Emma Sterrett-Hong, Jelani Kerr, Lesley M. Harris et al.
UNC Libraries
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
article

A Qualitative Exploration of Various Stigmas Impacting HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake Among African American Young Adults

Isabel Rozema, Emma Sterrett-Hong, Jelani Kerr, Lesley M. Harris, Nana Ama Aya Bullock, Ryan Combs, Janelle Sears, Toya Northington, Suur Ayangeakaa, Kelsey Burton
article en

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has promise for reducing racial/ethnic HIV disparities; yet, acceptance among African Americans remains low. PrEP-related stigmas may impact uptake, but this is understudied. This study examines mechanisms by which stigma impacts PrEP acceptance among various priority African American populations. Focus group data from 63 African American young adults (aged 18-29 years) in Louisville, Kentucky, explore how various stigmas impact attitudes toward PrEP. Data were analyzed using grounded theory analytic techniques. PrEP stigma, HIV stigma, sexual behavior stigma, and homophobia/transphobia individually reduce PrEP uptake. These stigmas also interact synergistically to undermine PrEP acceptance. Key challenges resulting from various stigmas and their interactions include medical hesitancy, lack of perceived susceptibility based on gender and sexuality, the role of gender norms in HIV prevention, and deprioritizing HIV prevention due to social rejection. Interventions to increase awareness, destigmatize PrEP, remediate social marginalization related to identity, HIV status, and gendered perceptions of sexual risk, as well as more focus on diverse priority groups, are needed to present PrEP as a viable HIV prevention option for African American communities. More research is needed to optimize strategies that address stigma and increase acceptance of novel HIV prevention technologies.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.