Partisan mortality cycles

Abstract Geographic disparities in mortality rates in the United States are pronounced and growing. The Black-White mortality gap is volatile but persistent, while the Rich-Poor mortality gap is increasing dramatically. While the causes of these inequalities are not understood, recent attention has focused on the role of place-specific factors. Here, we explore the importance of politics as a place-specific factor contributing to spatial inequality in mortality. Specifically, we test for the existence of partisan mortality cycles using panel data on counties from 1968 to 2016 and information on the political ideology of state and federal political officials. We confirm the existence of partisan mortality cycles, finding lower mortality in counties governed by more liberal political regimes. We also uncover several sources of heterogeneity. While additional research is needed, the analysis here suggests that analyses of spatial, racial, and income differences in mortality ought to start with the political system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Population Economics
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-025-01133-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Health Care Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partisan mortality cycles

Daniel L. Millimet, Travis Whitacre
1 citations
Journal of Population Economics
Global Health Care Issues
2.82
article

Partisan mortality cycles

Daniel L. Millimet, Travis Whitacre
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Geographic disparities in mortality rates in the United States are pronounced and growing. The Black-White mortality gap is volatile but persistent, while the Rich-Poor mortality gap is increasing dramatically. While the causes of these inequalities are not understood, recent attention has focused on the role of place-specific factors. Here, we explore the importance of politics as a place-specific factor contributing to spatial inequality in mortality. Specifically, we test for the existence of partisan mortality cycles using panel data on counties from 1968 to 2016 and information on the political ideology of state and federal political officials. We confirm the existence of partisan mortality cycles, finding lower mortality in counties governed by more liberal political regimes. We also uncover several sources of heterogeneity. While additional research is needed, the analysis here suggests that analyses of spatial, racial, and income differences in mortality ought to start with the political system.

Journal of Population EconomicsVol. 38(4)
Southern Methodist University (US), Yale University (US), Yale New Haven Health System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Health Care Issues
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Partisan mortality cycles — Daniel L. Millimet, Travis Whitacre · Journal of Population Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS