The GUIDE-HF trial of pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in heart failure: impact of the COVID-19 pandemic
AIMS: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, important changes in heart failure (HF) event rates have been widely reported, but few data address potential causes for these changes; several possibilities were examined in the GUIDE-HF study. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 15 March 2018 to 20 December 2019, patients were randomized to haemodynamic-guided management (treatment) vs. control for 12 months, with a primary endpoint of all-cause mortality plus HF events. Pre-COVID-19, the primary endpoint rate was 0.553 vs. 0.682 events/patient-year in the treatment vs. control group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, P = 0.049]. Treatment difference was no longer evident during COVID-19 (HR 1.11, P = 0.526), with a 21% decrease in the control group (0.536 events/patient-year) and no change in the treatment group (0.597 events/patient-year). Data reflecting provider-, disease-, and patient-dependent factors that might change the primary endpoint rate during COVID-19 were examined. Subject contact frequency was similar in the treatment vs. control group before and during COVID-19. During COVID-19, the monthly rate of medication changes fell 19.2% in the treatment vs. 10.7% in the control group to levels not different between groups (P = 0.362). COVID-19 was infrequent and not different between groups. Pulmonary artery pressure area under the curve decreased -98 mmHg-days in the treatment group vs. -100 mmHg-days in the controls (P = 0.867). Patient compliance with the study protocol was maintained during COVID-19 in both groups. CONCLUSION: During COVID-19, the primary event rate decreased in the controls and remained low in the treatment group, resulting in an effacement of group differences that were present pre-COVID-19. These outcomes did not result from changes in provider- or disease-dependent factors; pulmonary artery pressure decreased despite fewer medication changes, suggesting that patient-dependent factors played an important role in these outcomes. Clinical Trials.gov: NCT03387813.
Authors
- Jason L. Guichard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7381-5177)
- Frank W. Smart (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5134-8838)
- Sara Paul (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9191-9770)
- Maria Rosa Costanzo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6995-7538)
- Christopher Chien (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5425-6034)
- Anique Ducharme (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1681-9187)
- JoAnn M. Lindenfeld (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9207-3634)
- Ashrith Guha (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7246-9508)
- Alan S. Maisel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7467-0195)
- Michael R. Zile (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7076-221X)
- Mandeep R. Mehra (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8683-7044)
- Samuel F. Sears (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7863-3591)
- Nessa Johnson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1020-6091)
- Orvar Jonsson
- Akshay S. Desai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1443-0701)
- Shelley Hall (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5989-2934)
- Philip B. Adamson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8974-9004)
- John Henderson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5902-7107)
- Poornima Sood
Institutions
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- UNC Libraries
- Published
- 2025-04-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.17615/nkw3-et68
- Primary Topic
- Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00