Metonymy as an embodied resource in English as a lingua franca interaction

Metonymy is a cognitive operation, a predominantly inferential process, and more fundamental than metaphor (Denroche 2015). Over the past two decades, research has increasingly focused on the multimodality of human interaction, revealing that gestures are intrinsically abstract and partial representations and therefore often metonymic in nature (Mittelberg 2019; Mittelberg & Hinnell 2024). Nevertheless, both in cognitive linguistics and in gesture studies, metaphor has thus far received considerably more attention than metonymy. Given the well-established pervasiveness of metonymy in everyday communication among native speakers, this study investigates how non-native speakers collaboratively elaborate verbal–gestural metonymies on a turn-by-turn basis in English as a lingua franca (ELF) interactions, and examines the specific functions these metonymies serve. Based on a fine-grained analysis of three filmed and transcribed sequences selected from the ICMI corpus, we examine the way participants rely on metonymies when breaking down complex frames into more basic-level schemas that can function as building blocks. This raises important questions as to whether speakers use metonymies to cope with lexical gaps and to construct their conversations on the basis of a situationally co-constructed common ground, as Kecskes (2014, 2015) has pointed out for ELF interactions at the verbal level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos
Published
2025-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20396/cel.v67i00.8679801
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metonymy as an embodied resource in English as a lingua franca interaction

Ulrike Schröder
1 citations
Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
2.12
article

Metonymy as an embodied resource in English as a lingua franca interaction

Ulrike Schröder
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Metonymy is a cognitive operation, a predominantly inferential process, and more fundamental than metaphor (Denroche 2015). Over the past two decades, research has increasingly focused on the multimodality of human interaction, revealing that gestures are intrinsically abstract and partial representations and therefore often metonymic in nature (Mittelberg 2019; Mittelberg & Hinnell 2024). Nevertheless, both in cognitive linguistics and in gesture studies, metaphor has thus far received considerably more attention than metonymy. Given the well-established pervasiveness of metonymy in everyday communication among native speakers, this study investigates how non-native speakers collaboratively elaborate verbal–gestural metonymies on a turn-by-turn basis in English as a lingua franca (ELF) interactions, and examines the specific functions these metonymies serve. Based on a fine-grained analysis of three filmed and transcribed sequences selected from the ICMI corpus, we examine the way participants rely on metonymies when breaking down complex frames into more basic-level schemas that can function as building blocks. This raises important questions as to whether speakers use metonymies to cope with lexical gaps and to construct their conversations on the basis of a situationally co-constructed common ground, as Kecskes (2014, 2015) has pointed out for ELF interactions at the verbal level.

Cadernos de Estudos LingüísticosVol. 67
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Universität Potsdam, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Universität Duisburg-Essen
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.