The Bias of Subspace-based Data-Driven Predictive Control

This paper quantifies and addresses the bias of subspace-based Data-Driven Predictive Control (DDPC) for linear, time-invariant (LTI) systems. The primary focus is the bias that arises when the training data is gathered with a feedback controller in closed-loop with the system. First, the closed-loop bias of Subspace Predictive Control is quantified using the training data innovations. Next, the bias of direct, subspace-based DDPC methods DeePC and γ-DDPC is shown to consist of two parts—the Subspace Bias, which arises from closed-loop data, and an Optimism Bias, which arises from DeePC/γ-DDPC's "optimistic" adjustment of the output trajectory. We show that, unlike subspace-based DDPC methods, Transient Predictive Control does not suffer from Subspace Bias or Optimism Bias. Double integrator experiments demonstrate that Subspace and Optimism Bias are responsible for poor reference tracking by the subspace-based DDPC methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23919/ecc65951.2025.11187122
Primary Topic
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Bias of Subspace-based Data-Driven Predictive Control

Keith Moffat, Alessandro Chiuso, Florian Dörfler
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
article

The Bias of Subspace-based Data-Driven Predictive Control

Keith Moffat, Alessandro Chiuso, Florian Dörfler
article en

Abstract

This paper quantifies and addresses the bias of subspace-based Data-Driven Predictive Control (DDPC) for linear, time-invariant (LTI) systems. The primary focus is the bias that arises when the training data is gathered with a feedback controller in closed-loop with the system. First, the closed-loop bias of Subspace Predictive Control is quantified using the training data innovations. Next, the bias of direct, subspace-based DDPC methods DeePC and γ-DDPC is shown to consist of two parts—the Subspace Bias, which arises from closed-loop data, and an Optimism Bias, which arises from DeePC/γ-DDPC's "optimistic" adjustment of the output trajectory. We show that, unlike subspace-based DDPC methods, Transient Predictive Control does not suffer from Subspace Bias or Optimism Bias. Double integrator experiments demonstrate that Subspace and Optimism Bias are responsible for poor reference tracking by the subspace-based DDPC methods.

University of Padua (IT), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Bias of Subspace-based Data-Driven Predictive Control — Keith Moffat, Alessandro Chiuso, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS