Identifying Regions of Invulnerability in Multi-Agent Model Predictive Control

This paper explores the dependencies of local costs within multi-agent systems under model predictive control (MPC) actions. Specifically, we identify, for each point in each agent’s local state-space, the minimal and maximal influence of neighboring decisions. This is used to provide a bound between the global performance costs attained by noncooperative versus centralized MPC implementations, as well as to identify regions where the difference between the two is small. As such, this analysis provides suboptimality guarantees in distributed MPC schemes, particularly relevant for scenarios with reduced, and potentially dynamic, communication and coordination requirements. We illustrate the new tools in a numerical simulation of two masses coupled with springs and dampers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23919/ecc65951.2025.11186861
Primary Topic
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Regions of Invulnerability in Multi-Agent Model Predictive Control

Stefan van Dijk, Paula Chanfreut Palacio, W.P.M.H. Heemels
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
article

Identifying Regions of Invulnerability in Multi-Agent Model Predictive Control

Stefan van Dijk, Paula Chanfreut Palacio, W.P.M.H. Heemels
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the dependencies of local costs within multi-agent systems under model predictive control (MPC) actions. Specifically, we identify, for each point in each agent’s local state-space, the minimal and maximal influence of neighboring decisions. This is used to provide a bound between the global performance costs attained by noncooperative versus centralized MPC implementations, as well as to identify regions where the difference between the two is small. As such, this analysis provides suboptimality guarantees in distributed MPC schemes, particularly relevant for scenarios with reduced, and potentially dynamic, communication and coordination requirements. We illustrate the new tools in a numerical simulation of two masses coupled with springs and dampers.

Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Advanced Control Systems Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.