Integrating optical and SAR data for improved mangrove mapping: Performance analysis of OSCMI versus random forest classifier

Mangrove Forest (MF) extents and distributions are fundamental for conservation and restoration efforts. According to previous studies, Landsat and Sentinel-2 imageries are widely used for mangrove area mapping. There are also several vegetation indices from optical data for mangroves used to discriminate mangrove from other vegetation. Still, their performance is not satisfactory, especially due to their presence in the intertidal region. To address this limitation, Sentinel-1A SAR images are integrated with optical datasets for mangrove extent mapping. In this study, we have compared mangrove area obtained from two methods, first one is supervised classification using random forest classifier integrating vegetation indices with Sentinel-2 optical datasets. Another approach is threshold segmentation using combined optical and SAR images, as well as the Combined Mangrove Index (CMCI) with VV polarization. The result shows OSCMI based classification yield best results and outperforms random forest classification by optical data. Mangrove area estimated for the study area by OSCMI classification was 2027 ha with the overall accuracy of 84.7 % and kappa coefficient of 0.66. This shows integrating SAR data for mangrove area extraction improves accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plant Science Today
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.10180
Primary Topic
Automated Road and Building Extraction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating optical and SAR data for improved mangrove mapping: Performance analysis of OSCMI versus random forest classifier

R. Kumaraperumal, Pragadeeshwaran Kannan, V. Geethalakshmi, S Pazhanivelan et al.
Plant Science Today
Automated Road and Building Extraction
article

Integrating optical and SAR data for improved mangrove mapping: Performance analysis of OSCMI versus random forest classifier

R. Kumaraperumal, Pragadeeshwaran Kannan, V. Geethalakshmi, S Pazhanivelan, B Sabarinathan, P C Prabu
article en

Abstract

Mangrove Forest (MF) extents and distributions are fundamental for conservation and restoration efforts. According to previous studies, Landsat and Sentinel-2 imageries are widely used for mangrove area mapping. There are also several vegetation indices from optical data for mangroves used to discriminate mangrove from other vegetation. Still, their performance is not satisfactory, especially due to their presence in the intertidal region. To address this limitation, Sentinel-1A SAR images are integrated with optical datasets for mangrove extent mapping. In this study, we have compared mangrove area obtained from two methods, first one is supervised classification using random forest classifier integrating vegetation indices with Sentinel-2 optical datasets. Another approach is threshold segmentation using combined optical and SAR images, as well as the Combined Mangrove Index (CMCI) with VV polarization. The result shows OSCMI based classification yield best results and outperforms random forest classification by optical data. Mangrove area estimated for the study area by OSCMI classification was 2027 ha with the overall accuracy of 84.7 % and kappa coefficient of 0.66. This shows integrating SAR data for mangrove area extraction improves accuracy.

Plant Science TodayVol. 12(sp1)
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Automated Road and Building Extraction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.