Documenting the Information Needs of Students and Faculty for ATS Standards Using Student Bibliographic Analysis

The question asked in this paper was whether student bibliographies can be used to assess the usage of a library’s collection and thus answer the ATS standard of documenting information needs. The goal was to analyze ten percent of student bibliographies submitted in papers during the past four semesters. This analysis showed that 88% of the citations in this sample could also be found in our two database vendors, the Digital Theological Library (80%) and EBSCO’s eBook Religion Collection (46.4%). Additionally, vendor-supplied statistics did not always parallel student citations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ATLA Summary of Proceedings
Published
2025-03-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31046/2vvye892
Primary Topic
Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Documenting the Information Needs of Students and Faculty for ATS Standards Using Student Bibliographic Analysis

Ed Hughes
ATLA Summary of Proceedings
Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
article

Documenting the Information Needs of Students and Faculty for ATS Standards Using Student Bibliographic Analysis

Ed Hughes
article en

Abstract

The question asked in this paper was whether student bibliographies can be used to assess the usage of a library’s collection and thus answer the ATS standard of documenting information needs. The goal was to analyze ten percent of student bibliographies submitted in papers during the past four semesters. This analysis showed that 88% of the citations in this sample could also be found in our two database vendors, the Digital Theological Library (80%) and EBSCO’s eBook Religion Collection (46.4%). Additionally, vendor-supplied statistics did not always parallel student citations.

ATLA Summary of Proceedings
Memphis Theological Seminary (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.