Phase control of a wall-locked tearing mode in ITER-like cylindrical tokamak

Abstract The phase-control of a wall-locked tearing mode by application of external magnetic perturbations is examined with analytical and numerical means. The analyses are applied to a cylindrical proxy of ITER, as in other recent studies. An error field (EF), similar in amplitude to that estimated in ITER, is also included in a dedicated study. The standard feedforward method is compared to two different non-zero radial field reference feedback (FB) algorithms. The first exploits a fixed amplitude reference. The second one can be viewed as a pure phase control, since the amplitude reference is not assigned. Generally speaking, FB is more efficient than feedforward, because it aligns the mode phase to the target value with a smaller current request, implying also a smaller edge radial field. Nonetheless, the pure FB phase control exhibits limit-cycle oscillations when the EF is in phase opposition to the target. On the contrary, these oscillations do not occur with the fixed amplitude reference FB, which therefore emerges from this study as the preferable control technique.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ae1326
Primary Topic
Magnetic confinement fusion research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phase control of a wall-locked tearing mode in ITER-like cylindrical tokamak

P. Zanca, G. Marchiori
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
Magnetic confinement fusion research
article

Phase control of a wall-locked tearing mode in ITER-like cylindrical tokamak

P. Zanca, G. Marchiori
article en

Abstract

Abstract The phase-control of a wall-locked tearing mode by application of external magnetic perturbations is examined with analytical and numerical means. The analyses are applied to a cylindrical proxy of ITER, as in other recent studies. An error field (EF), similar in amplitude to that estimated in ITER, is also included in a dedicated study. The standard feedforward method is compared to two different non-zero radial field reference feedback (FB) algorithms. The first exploits a fixed amplitude reference. The second one can be viewed as a pure phase control, since the amplitude reference is not assigned. Generally speaking, FB is more efficient than feedforward, because it aligns the mode phase to the target value with a smaller current request, implying also a smaller edge radial field. Nonetheless, the pure FB phase control exhibits limit-cycle oscillations when the EF is in phase opposition to the target. On the contrary, these oscillations do not occur with the fixed amplitude reference FB, which therefore emerges from this study as the preferable control technique.

Plasma Physics and Controlled FusionVol. 67(10)
Consorzio per la Ricerca Sanitaria (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Magnetic confinement fusion research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.