Šiaulių miesto ir apskrities gyventojų šeimų sudėtis XVIII a. pabaigoje

The article presents a comparative analysis of the structure of the families of the nobles, free people and peasants living in the towns of Šiauliai and Žagarė, as well as the small towns of Šiauliai county, which aims to answer the question of how much the family structure of the residents of the county center Šiauliai differed from other cities and towns in the county, so as well as families of village residents. In addition, the aim is to find out whether at the end of the 18th century, there was an “urban” family model. Using Eugene Alfred Hammel ir Peter Laslett’s (1974) typology, established in historical demography, families are classified into solitary, non-family, nuclear, extended and multiple families, paying attention to the proportion of single and nuclear families. In the analysis, families are divided not only by class, but also into those with and without immovable property. Empirical analysis shows that among residents with and without immovable property, the largest number of nuclear families was among the residents of the cities of Šiauliai and Žagarė. Meanwhile, among the freedmen and peasants who owned the immovable property, although nuclear families made up a significant proportion, there was no single dominant family model. However, landless free people and peasants mostly lived only in nuclear families. On the other hand, solitaries were more common among Šiauliai and Žagarė residents who did not have immovable property than among rural residents. The results of the study suggest that non-agricultural activities and lack of immovable property encouraged living in nuclear families, but this family model did not necessarily depend on whether the family lived in the city or the countryside.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta humanitarica academiae Saulensis
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15388/ahas.2025.32.2
Primary Topic
Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Šiaulių miesto ir apskrities gyventojų šeimų sudėtis XVIII a. pabaigoje

Laurynas Giedrimas
Acta humanitarica academiae Saulensis
Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
article

Šiaulių miesto ir apskrities gyventojų šeimų sudėtis XVIII a. pabaigoje

Laurynas Giedrimas
article en

Abstract

The article presents a comparative analysis of the structure of the families of the nobles, free people and peasants living in the towns of Šiauliai and Žagarė, as well as the small towns of Šiauliai county, which aims to answer the question of how much the family structure of the residents of the county center Šiauliai differed from other cities and towns in the county, so as well as families of village residents. In addition, the aim is to find out whether at the end of the 18th century, there was an “urban” family model. Using Eugene Alfred Hammel ir Peter Laslett’s (1974) typology, established in historical demography, families are classified into solitary, non-family, nuclear, extended and multiple families, paying attention to the proportion of single and nuclear families. In the analysis, families are divided not only by class, but also into those with and without immovable property. Empirical analysis shows that among residents with and without immovable property, the largest number of nuclear families was among the residents of the cities of Šiauliai and Žagarė. Meanwhile, among the freedmen and peasants who owned the immovable property, although nuclear families made up a significant proportion, there was no single dominant family model. However, landless free people and peasants mostly lived only in nuclear families. On the other hand, solitaries were more common among Šiauliai and Žagarė residents who did not have immovable property than among rural residents. The results of the study suggest that non-agricultural activities and lack of immovable property encouraged living in nuclear families, but this family model did not necessarily depend on whether the family lived in the city or the countryside.

Acta humanitarica academiae SaulensisVol. 32
Lithuanian Institute of History (LT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.