Relational inclusivity in education: comparing SNA Toolkit findings with ERGM models to advance a relational approach to inclusion

Introduction Inclusion is a universal right and a fundamental pillar of education. However, current educational models often overlook the relational nature of students, failing to address this social challenge effectively. Relational inclusivity emphasizes the importance of interpersonal relationships in fostering equitable and inclusive learning environments. The SNA Toolkit is a practical and versatile software that enables educators to assess student relationships through Social Network Analysis (SNA), promoting relational inclusivity. While widely recognized for its accessibility and versatility, its data quality has not been systematically compared with advanced statistical techniques, such as Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs). This study aimed to evaluate the consistency of the SNA Toolkit by comparing its findings with ERGMs, assessing its accuracy in providing high-quality actionable insights for educators. Methods Using a cross-sectional observational design, the study analyzed 32 7th-grade students from a socio-demographically diverse classroom in California. A peer-nomination survey mapped the four key networks of relational inclusivity: friendship, recess, academic support, and emotional wellbeing. Data were analyzed using both the SNA Toolkit and ERGMs to examine network structures, homophily, and relational dynamics. Results Results revealed that the SNA Toolkit closely aligned with ERGM outputs, confirming its consistency. Across the four networks, both analyses indicated low density (< 0.22; β < 1.82) and high reciprocity (>0.52; β > 1.82). Homophily effects for gender, SEND and ethno-racial group were also consistent, with E–I Index ranging from −0.05 to −0.39 below expected, and β = 0.311–1.327. By contrast, no evidence of socioeconomic status homophily was found. Discussion While ERGMs provided inferential insights, the SNA Toolkit effectively captured the same patterns through descriptive and visual analyses, making it more accessible for educators. These findings position the SNA Toolkit as a practical, evidence-based tool for fostering relational inclusivity, allowing educators and researchers to identify isolated students, assess group cohesion, and implement targeted interventions to create more inclusive learning environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1665004
Primary Topic
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relational inclusivity in education: comparing SNA Toolkit findings with ERGM models to advance a relational approach to inclusion

Christoforos Mamas, Carlos Mallén-Lacambra
Frontiers in Education
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
article

Relational inclusivity in education: comparing SNA Toolkit findings with ERGM models to advance a relational approach to inclusion

Christoforos Mamas, Carlos Mallén-Lacambra
article en

Abstract

Introduction Inclusion is a universal right and a fundamental pillar of education. However, current educational models often overlook the relational nature of students, failing to address this social challenge effectively. Relational inclusivity emphasizes the importance of interpersonal relationships in fostering equitable and inclusive learning environments. The SNA Toolkit is a practical and versatile software that enables educators to assess student relationships through Social Network Analysis (SNA), promoting relational inclusivity. While widely recognized for its accessibility and versatility, its data quality has not been systematically compared with advanced statistical techniques, such as Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGMs). This study aimed to evaluate the consistency of the SNA Toolkit by comparing its findings with ERGMs, assessing its accuracy in providing high-quality actionable insights for educators. Methods Using a cross-sectional observational design, the study analyzed 32 7th-grade students from a socio-demographically diverse classroom in California. A peer-nomination survey mapped the four key networks of relational inclusivity: friendship, recess, academic support, and emotional wellbeing. Data were analyzed using both the SNA Toolkit and ERGMs to examine network structures, homophily, and relational dynamics. Results Results revealed that the SNA Toolkit closely aligned with ERGM outputs, confirming its consistency. Across the four networks, both analyses indicated low density (< 0.22; β < 1.82) and high reciprocity (>0.52; β > 1.82). Homophily effects for gender, SEND and ethno-racial group were also consistent, with E–I Index ranging from −0.05 to −0.39 below expected, and β = 0.311–1.327. By contrast, no evidence of socioeconomic status homophily was found. Discussion While ERGMs provided inferential insights, the SNA Toolkit effectively captured the same patterns through descriptive and visual analyses, making it more accessible for educators. These findings position the SNA Toolkit as a practical, evidence-based tool for fostering relational inclusivity, allowing educators and researchers to identify isolated students, assess group cohesion, and implement targeted interventions to create more inclusive learning environments.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
California Department of Education (US), Universitat de Lleida (ES), University of California San Diego (US), Institut Nacional d'Educació Física de Catalunya (ES)
European Commission, Generalitat de Catalunya, Universitat de Lleida, Institut Nacional d'Educacio Fisica de Catalunya, Generalitat de Catalunya, Erasmus+
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.