Experimental study on buoyancy and side friction of underground silos in sand and silty clay

In current anti-flotation designs for underground structures, buoyancy is typically calculated based on Archimedes’ principle and the contribution of side friction is often neglected, potentially resulting in unnecessary construction costs. In this study, a silo model with a vertically movable base was designed to conduct buoyancy tests under various water levels in both sand and silty clay. The attenuation pattern of groundwater buoyancy was analyzed, and the contribution of side friction to anti-flotation performance was also evaluated. The results indicate that: (1) Under the same water level, pore water pressure in sand was generally higher than that in silty clay, and with faster transmission and stabilization. (2) Buoyancy in sand was typically larger than that in silty clay at identical water level. Corresponding to the water levels of 65 cm, 70 cm, and 75 cm, the reduction coefficients of buoyancy were 0.87, 0.93, and 0.98 in sand, and 0.82, 0.89, and 0.94 in silty clay respectively. (3) The side friction acting on the silo model in sand was consistently lower than that in silty clay. The ratios of side friction to theoretical buoyancy in sand were 0.35, 0.32, and 0.25 at the water levels of 65 cm, 70 cm, and 75 cm, respectively; while in silty clay, the corresponding values were 0.47, 0.41, and 0.34. In practical engineering, it might be more rational to consider the reduction of buoyancy and the contribution of side friction, especially in weakly permeable soils such as silty clay, in the anti-flotation design of underground structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Earth Science
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2025.1698922
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental study on buoyancy and side friction of underground silos in sand and silty clay

Bo Yang, Chengyao Zhang, Na Su, Di‐Cheng Zhu et al.
Frontiers in Earth Science
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
article

Experimental study on buoyancy and side friction of underground silos in sand and silty clay

Bo Yang, Chengyao Zhang, Na Su, Di‐Cheng Zhu, Shaopeng Chen, Shun Zhang
article en

Abstract

In current anti-flotation designs for underground structures, buoyancy is typically calculated based on Archimedes’ principle and the contribution of side friction is often neglected, potentially resulting in unnecessary construction costs. In this study, a silo model with a vertically movable base was designed to conduct buoyancy tests under various water levels in both sand and silty clay. The attenuation pattern of groundwater buoyancy was analyzed, and the contribution of side friction to anti-flotation performance was also evaluated. The results indicate that: (1) Under the same water level, pore water pressure in sand was generally higher than that in silty clay, and with faster transmission and stabilization. (2) Buoyancy in sand was typically larger than that in silty clay at identical water level. Corresponding to the water levels of 65 cm, 70 cm, and 75 cm, the reduction coefficients of buoyancy were 0.87, 0.93, and 0.98 in sand, and 0.82, 0.89, and 0.94 in silty clay respectively. (3) The side friction acting on the silo model in sand was consistently lower than that in silty clay. The ratios of side friction to theoretical buoyancy in sand were 0.35, 0.32, and 0.25 at the water levels of 65 cm, 70 cm, and 75 cm, respectively; while in silty clay, the corresponding values were 0.47, 0.41, and 0.34. In practical engineering, it might be more rational to consider the reduction of buoyancy and the contribution of side friction, especially in weakly permeable soils such as silty clay, in the anti-flotation design of underground structures.

Frontiers in Earth ScienceVol. 13
Central South University (CN), Henan University of Technology (CN), Beijing Automotive Group (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.