Quantum Perfect Matchings

Abstract We investigate quantum and nonsignaling generalizations of perfect matchings in graphs using nonlocal games. Specifically, we introduce nonlocal games that test for L -perfect matchings in bipartite graphs, perfect matchings in general graphs and hypergraphs, and fractional perfect matchings. Our definitions come from the fact that these games are classical property tests for the corresponding matching conditions. We use the existence of perfect quantum and nonsignaling strategies for these games to define quantum and nonsignaling versions of perfect matchings. Finally, we provide characterizations of when graphs exhibit these extended properties: For nonsignaling matchings, we give a complete combinatorial characterization. In particular, a graph has a nonsignaling perfect matching if and only if it admits a fractional perfect matching that has bounded value on triangles. In bipartite graphs, the nonsignaling L -perfect matching property is achieved exactly when the left component of the graph can be split into two disjoint subgraphs: one with a classical L -perfect matching and another with left-degree 2. In the quantum setting, we show that complete graphs $$K_n$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> with odd $$n \ge 7$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:mn>7</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> have quantum perfect matchings. We prove that a graph has a quantum perfect matching if and only if the quantum independence number of its line graph is maximal, extending a classical relationship between perfect matchings and line graph independence numbers. For bipartite graphs, we establish that the L -perfect matching game does not exhibit quantum pseudotelepathy, but we characterize the quantum advantage for complete bipartite graphs $$K_{n,2}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> . Additionally, we prove that deciding quantum perfect matchings in hypergraphs is undecidable and leaves open the question of its complexity in graphs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annales Henri Poincaré
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-025-01632-5
Primary Topic
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantum Perfect Matchings

Seyed Sajjad Nezhadi, Laura Mančinska, David E. Roberson, David Cui
Annales Henri Poincaré
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
article

Quantum Perfect Matchings

Seyed Sajjad Nezhadi, Laura Mančinska, David E. Roberson, David Cui
article en

Abstract

Abstract We investigate quantum and nonsignaling generalizations of perfect matchings in graphs using nonlocal games. Specifically, we introduce nonlocal games that test for L -perfect matchings in bipartite graphs, perfect matchings in general graphs and hypergraphs, and fractional perfect matchings. Our definitions come from the fact that these games are classical property tests for the corresponding matching conditions. We use the existence of perfect quantum and nonsignaling strategies for these games to define quantum and nonsignaling versions of perfect matchings. Finally, we provide characterizations of when graphs exhibit these extended properties: For nonsignaling matchings, we give a complete combinatorial characterization. In particular, a graph has a nonsignaling perfect matching if and only if it admits a fractional perfect matching that has bounded value on triangles. In bipartite graphs, the nonsignaling L -perfect matching property is achieved exactly when the left component of the graph can be split into two disjoint subgraphs: one with a classical L -perfect matching and another with left-degree 2. In the quantum setting, we show that complete graphs $$K_n$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> </mml:msub> </mml:math> with odd $$n \ge 7$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo>≥</mml:mo> <mml:mn>7</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> have quantum perfect matchings. We prove that a graph has a quantum perfect matching if and only if the quantum independence number of its line graph is maximal, extending a classical relationship between perfect matchings and line graph independence numbers. For bipartite graphs, we establish that the L -perfect matching game does not exhibit quantum pseudotelepathy, but we characterize the quantum advantage for complete bipartite graphs $$K_{n,2}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo>,</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:math> . Additionally, we prove that deciding quantum perfect matchings in hypergraphs is undecidable and leaves open the question of its complexity in graphs.

Annales Henri Poincaré
University of Copenhagen (DK), Joint Center for Quantum Information and Computer Science (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.